Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kyoto Tycoon vs Tibero: What are the differences?
What is Kyoto Tycoon? A handy cache/storage server. Kyoto Tycoon is a lightweight database server with auto expiration mechanism, which is useful to handle cache data and persistent data of various applications. Kyoto Tycoon is also a package of network interface to the DBM called Kyoto Cabinet.
What is Tibero? Enterprise RDBMS of choice for the virtual data center. It is a high-performance, highly secure, highly scalable relational database management system (RDBMS) for enterprises that want to fully leverage their mission-critical data. In a world where data is at the core of everything, Tibero provides an enhanced view of processing, managing and securing large-scale databases.
Kyoto Tycoon and Tibero can be primarily classified as "Databases" tools.
We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL-as-a-Service that the users can deploy in any Cloud without concerns from our website at some standard cost. With Oracle Database, developers would have to worry about what they implement and the related costs of each feature but the licensing model from Tibero is just 1 price and we have all features included, so we don't have to worry and developers using our SQLaaS neither. PostgreSQL would be open source. We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL that you can deploy in any Cloud without concerns. PostgreSQL would be the open source option but we need to offer an SQLaaS with encryption and more enterprise features in the background and best value option we have found, it was Tibero Database for PL/SQL-based applications.
Pros of Kyoto Tycoon
- RESTful API2
- Simple, persistent Key-Value Store2
- Easy setup1
Pros of Tibero
- Enterprise Edition all inclusive without extra purchase1
- Reliable shared server1
- Multi-node parallel recovery1
- High security database encryption1
- Hyper-thread architecture1
- Active or passive standby DB capability1
- High performance transaction processing1
- Lower TCO1
- Simple Licensing model1
- High availability (Active-Active clustering)1
- Highly compatible with Oracle1
