Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kyoto Tycoon

5
17
+ 1
5
ScyllaDB

105
147
+ 1
8
Add tool

Kyoto Tycoon vs Scylla: What are the differences?

What is Kyoto Tycoon? A handy cache/storage server. Kyoto Tycoon is a lightweight database server with auto expiration mechanism, which is useful to handle cache data and persistent data of various applications. Kyoto Tycoon is also a package of network interface to the DBM called Kyoto Cabinet.

What is Scylla? Next Generation Cassandra. Real-time big data database, with scale-up performance of 1,000,000 IOPS per node, scale-out to 100s of nodes and 99 latency of less than 1 msec.

Kyoto Tycoon and Scylla can be categorized as "Databases" tools.

Scylla is an open source tool with 5.18K GitHub stars and 615 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Scylla's open source repository on GitHub.

Advice on Kyoto Tycoon and ScyllaDB
Vinay Mehta
Needs advice
on
CassandraCassandra
and
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

The problem I have is - we need to process & change(update/insert) 55M Data every 2 min and this updated data to be available for Rest API for Filtering / Selection. Response time for Rest API should be less than 1 sec.

The most important factors for me are processing and storing time of 2 min. There need to be 2 views of Data One is for Selection & 2. Changed data.

See more
Replies (4)
Alex Peake
Recommends
CassandraCassandra

Cassandra is quite capable of the task, in a highly available way, given appropriate scaling of the system. Remember that updates are only inserts, and that efficient retrieval is only by key (which can be a complex key). Talking of keys, make sure that the keys are well distributed.

See more
Recommends
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

Scylla can handle 1M/s events with a simple data model quite easily. The api to query is CQL, we have REST api but that's for control/monitoring

See more
Pankaj Soni
Chief Technical Officer at Software Joint · | 2 upvotes · 107.9K views
Recommends
CassandraCassandra

i love syclla for pet projects however it's license which is based on server model is an issue. thus i recommend cassandra

See more
Recommends
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

By 55M do you mean 55 million entity changes per 2 minutes? It is relatively high, means almost 460k per second. If I had to choose between Scylla or Cassandra, I would opt for Scylla as it is promising better performance for simple operations. However, maybe it would be worth to consider yet another alternative technology. Take into consideration required consistency, reliability and high availability and you may realize that there are more suitable once. Rest API should not be the main driver, because you can always develop the API yourself, if not supported by given technology.

See more
Decisions about Kyoto Tycoon and ScyllaDB
Tom Klein

The Gentlent Tech Team made lots of updates within the past year. The biggest one being our database:

We decided to migrate our #PostgreSQL -based database systems to a custom implementation of #Cassandra . This allows us to integrate our product data perfectly in a system that just makes sense. High availability and scalability are supported out of the box.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Kyoto Tycoon
Pros of ScyllaDB
  • 2
    RESTful API
  • 2
    Simple, persistent Key-Value Store
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Replication
  • 1
    Fewer nodes
  • 1
    Distributed
  • 1
    Scale up
  • 1
    High availability
  • 1
    Written in C++
  • 1
    High performance

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Kyoto Tycoon?

Kyoto Tycoon is a lightweight database server with auto expiration mechanism, which is useful to handle cache data and persistent data of various applications. Kyoto Tycoon is also a package of network interface to the DBM called Kyoto Cabinet.

What is ScyllaDB?

ScyllaDB is the database for data-intensive apps that require high performance and low latency. It enables teams to harness the ever-increasing computing power of modern infrastructures – eliminating barriers to scale as data grows.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Kyoto Tycoon and ScyllaDB as a desired skillset
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
What companies use Kyoto Tycoon?
What companies use ScyllaDB?
See which teams inside your own company are using Kyoto Tycoon or ScyllaDB.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kyoto Tycoon?
What tools integrate with ScyllaDB?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Kyoto Tycoon and ScyllaDB?
Redis
Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.
See all alternatives