Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

59.9K
51.8K
+ 1
681
OpenNebula

33
119
+ 1
0
Add tool

Kubernetes vs OpenNebula: What are the differences?

Introduction

Kubernetes and OpenNebula are both popular open-source container orchestration platforms that provide tools for managing and deploying applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Kubernetes follows a container-centric approach, where applications are deployed in containers, grouped into pods, and managed by a cluster of nodes. On the other hand, OpenNebula takes a virtual machine-centric approach, where applications are deployed within virtual machines that are managed by a cluster of hypervisors. This fundamental difference in architecture leads to variations in the way these platforms handle resource allocation, scalability, and workload management.

  2. Focus: Kubernetes primarily aims at managing containers and microservices-based applications, providing features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and service discovery, making it more suitable for cloud-native and distributed environments. OpenNebula, on the other hand, focuses on managing virtual machines and provides features such as multi-tenancy, virtual network management, and hybrid cloud integration, making it well-suited for diverse workloads and hybrid cloud deployments.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a larger and more active community compared to OpenNebula, resulting in a broader range of supported features, extensive documentation, and a vast ecosystem of tools and integrations. This active community and ecosystem provide better support, faster bug fixes, and more frequent updates, making Kubernetes a preferred choice for many organizations.

  4. Ease of Use: Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve due to its complex architecture and extensive set of features. It requires a good understanding of networking, containerization, and distributed systems concepts. OpenNebula, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more intuitive approach, making it easier to learn and use, especially for users who are familiar with traditional virtualization technologies.

  5. Scalability and Resource Management: Kubernetes offers powerful auto-scaling features and fine-grained resource management capabilities, allowing efficient utilization of compute resources and dynamic scaling based on application needs. OpenNebula provides similar capabilities but focuses more on optimizing virtual machine resource allocation and scheduling, making it suitable for scenarios that require precise control over resource allocation and management.

  6. Deployment Flexibility: Kubernetes is designed to be cloud-agnostic and can be deployed on a variety of cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure. It also supports more advanced deployment options like multi-cluster and multi-region setups. OpenNebula, on the other hand, provides a unified management interface for hybrid cloud deployments, allowing users to seamlessly manage resources across public and private clouds, making it a good choice for organizations with diverse infrastructure requirements.

In summary, Kubernetes and OpenNebula differ in their underlying architecture, focus, community support, ease of use, scalability and resource management capabilities, and deployment flexibility. Understanding these differences is crucial for choosing the right platform that aligns with specific application requirements and infrastructure goals.

Decisions about Kubernetes and OpenNebula
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.2M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of OpenNebula
  • 166
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 129
    Simple and powerful
  • 107
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Simple
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 2
    Sfg
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Kubernetes
    Cons of OpenNebula
    • 16
      Steep learning curve
    • 15
      Poor workflow for development
    • 8
      Orchestrates only infrastructure
    • 4
      High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
    • 2
      Too heavy for simple systems
    • 1
      Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
    • 1
      More moving parts to secure
    • 1
      Additional Technology Overhead
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Kubernetes?

      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

      What is OpenNebula?

      It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Kubernetes?
      What companies use OpenNebula?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
      What tools integrate with OpenNebula?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Kubernetesetcd+2
      2
      1195
      Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

      DigitalOcean

      GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
      2
      2448
      PythonDockerKubernetes+7
      3
      1157
      May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
      5
      1535
      Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesRancher+2
      2
      973
      What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and OpenNebula?
      Docker Swarm
      Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
      Nomad
      Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
      OpenStack
      OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
      Rancher
      Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
      Docker Compose
      With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
      See all alternatives