StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Kitematic vs Portainer

Kitematic vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kitematic
Kitematic
Stacks67
Followers116
Votes14
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Kitematic vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction

Kitematic and Portainer are two popular tools used for managing and deploying Docker containers. While both tools offer similar functionality, there are several key differences between them that can influence the choice of tool for specific use cases.

Key Differences between Kitematic and Portainer

  1. User Interface Design: Kitematic provides a simpler and more intuitive user interface, with a focus on ease of use and beginner-friendliness. On the other hand, Portainer offers a more comprehensive and advanced user interface, catering to more experienced users who require greater control and customization options.

  2. Architecture: Kitematic is a standalone application that runs locally on the user's machine, providing a graphical interface for managing Docker containers. In contrast, Portainer is a web-based application that can be deployed on a server, allowing users to access and manage Docker containers remotely via a browser.

  3. Platform Support: Kitematic is primarily designed for macOS and Windows, offering a native experience on these platforms. Portainer, on the other hand, supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, making it a more versatile choice for users with diverse operating systems.

  4. Feature Set: Kitematic focuses on essential container management tasks like container creation, starting and stopping containers, and basic network configuration. Portainer, on the other hand, offers a broader set of features including image management, volume management, multi-container application deployment, and advanced network configuration options.

  5. Integration: Kitematic integrates tightly with Docker Machine, a tool for creating and managing Docker hosts. This integration allows users to quickly provision new hosts and manage them through Kitematic. Portainer, on the other hand, does not have a built-in integration with Docker Machine but provides comprehensive integration with Docker Swarm for advanced orchestration capabilities.

  6. Community Support: Kitematic has a smaller community compared to Portainer, which means that it may have limited community-contributed plugins and extensions. Portainer, being widely adopted, has a larger community that actively contributes to its development, resulting in a broader range of available plugins and extensions.

In Summary, Kitematic offers a simpler user interface with a focus on ease of use and beginner-friendliness, primarily supporting macOS and Windows. On the other hand, Portainer provides a more comprehensive interface, supports multiple platforms, offers a wider range of features, and has a larger community supporting its development.

Detailed Comparison

Kitematic
Kitematic
Portainer
Portainer

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Mac App with GUI for Docker;Create images from any folder with a Dockerfile in it;Configure environment variables;Check App logs;Easily terminal into apps;Restart apps
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
67
Stacks
507
Followers
116
Followers
842
Votes
14
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    I like it because it sucks
  • 3
    No command line, Docker in one app, gui, easy to set up
  • 2
    Good for first timer
  • 1
    Easy to get started
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Kitematic, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Docker Machine

Docker Machine

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana