Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
KeyDB vs Redis: What are the differences?
KeyDB and Redis are both in-memory data stores known for their performance and scalability. Here are the key differences between the two:
Replication Models: KeyDB and Redis use different replication models. Redis uses a single-threaded replication model where a single process handles all requests, while KeyDB uses a multi-threaded replication model where multiple threads can handle concurrent requests. This allows KeyDB to handle higher loads and distribute the workload more efficiently.
Write Amplification: KeyDB provides significant improvements in write performance compared to Redis. It achieves this by reducing write amplification, which means that fewer write operations are required when updating data. This allows KeyDB to handle a higher rate of write operations with less impact on performance.
Advanced Data Structures: KeyDB provides additional data structures beyond what Redis offers. While Redis supports key-value pairs, lists, sets, and hashes, KeyDB introduces new data structures like sorted sets and fixed-size lists. These additional data structures offer more flexibility in organizing and manipulating data.
Optimized Storage Model: KeyDB provides an optimized storage model that reduces memory consumption compared to Redis. KeyDB employs a hashed key indexing approach and compresses data when it exceeds a certain threshold. This optimization allows for efficient memory utilization, making KeyDB suitable for applications with limited memory resources.
Faster Redis Protocol Compatibility: KeyDB is designed to be fully compatible with the Redis protocol, but also offers performance enhancements. KeyDB can handle higher request rates and has minimal latency compared to Redis, making it an ideal choice for applications that require high throughput and low latency.
Active-Active Replication: KeyDB introduces active-active replication, allowing data to be synchronized between multiple KeyDB instances. This provides high availability and fault tolerance, ensuring that data remains consistent across different instances. Redis, on the other hand, supports active-passive replication where one node acts as the primary and the others as backups.
In summary, KeyDB and Redis are both in-memory databases, with KeyDB being a high-performance, multithreaded fork of Redis. While Redis is a widely adopted and established solution, KeyDB differentiates itself by optimizing for multithreading, offering improved performance and scalability in scenarios with high concurrency.
Pros of KeyDB
- Performance3
- Active Replication2
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of KeyDB
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1