Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Karma

2.5K
602
+ 1
181
Nightwatchjs

171
323
+ 1
11
Add tool

Karma vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Karma and Nightwatch.js are popular JavaScript testing frameworks used for different purposes. While Karma focuses on unit testing for web applications, Nightwatch.js is designed for end-to-end testing. Despite their common goal of ensuring software quality, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Testing Approach: Karma follows a unit testing approach, where individual modules or components of a web application are tested in isolation. It provides a test runner that executes tests directly in real browsers. On the other hand, Nightwatch.js follows an end-to-end testing approach, where tests simulate real user interactions with the application in a browser environment.

  2. Test Writing: Karma primarily requires developers to write tests using a testing framework like Mocha, Jasmine, or QUnit. These tests are typically written in JavaScript, using assertion libraries like Chai or Jasmine. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, allows test creation using a built-in domain-specific language (DSL), where tests can be written in a more readable and concise format using keywords and assertions.

  3. Configuration: Setting up and configuring Karma can be more complex compared to Nightwatch.js. Karma requires developers to define a configuration file that specifies the test frameworks, browsers, preprocessors, and other settings. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, provides a more straightforward configuration approach, allowing developers to configure the test environment through a single configuration file.

  4. Browser Compatibility: Karma supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, among others. It allows developers to run tests across different browsers simultaneously or sequentially. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, utilizes Selenium WebDriver, which supports various browsers as well. However, it requires additional configuration for running tests on multiple browsers simultaneously.

  5. Parallel Execution: Karma supports parallel test execution, allowing developers to run tests in multiple browsers concurrently. This is useful for reducing the overall test execution time, especially for large test suites. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, does not provide built-in parallel test execution capabilities. However, it can be combined with other tools like Selenium Grid or Docker to achieve parallel test execution.

  6. Integration with CI/CD: Both Karma and Nightwatch.js can be integrated into a continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. However, Karma's integration may require additional configuration and setup to work seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins or Travis CI. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, offers better out-of-the-box integration with CI/CD tools, making it easier to include end-to-end tests in the automated pipeline.

In summary, Karma and Nightwatch.js differ in their testing approach, test writing style, configuration complexity, browser compatibility, parallel execution capabilities, and integration with CI/CD. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the appropriate testing framework based on their specific requirements.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Karma
Pros of Nightwatchjs
  • 61
    Test Runner
  • 35
    Open source
  • 27
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Great for running tests
  • 18
    Test on Real Devices
  • 11
    Backed by google
  • 5
    Easy Debugging
  • 2
    Remote Control
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Testing
  • 2
    Automates browsers
  • 1
    Better cross browser (use selenium)
  • 1
    Cross-Browser Testing
  • 1
    Multiple Browser Support
  • 1
    Parallel Test Running

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Karma
Cons of Nightwatchjs
  • 1
    Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
  • 1
    Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically
  • 2
    No automatic wait
  • 1
    Less flexibility
  • 1
    Limited native mobile app support
  • 1
    Limited browser support
  • 1
    Configuration complexity

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Karma?

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

What is Nightwatchjs?

Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Karma?
What companies use Nightwatchjs?
See which teams inside your own company are using Karma or Nightwatchjs.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Karma?
What tools integrate with Nightwatchjs?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Karma and Nightwatchjs?
Jasmine
Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
Jest
Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
Mocha
Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
Protractor
Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
See all alternatives