Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs k3s: What are the differences?
Introduction
Kubernetes and k3s are both open-source container orchestration platforms, but they have some key differences in their design and features. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Kubernetes and k3s.
Lightweight and Simplified Architecture: One of the major differences between Kubernetes and k3s lies in their architecture. Kubernetes has a complex architecture with various components like etcd, kube-scheduler, kube-controller-manager, kube-apiserver, and kubelet. On the other hand, k3s is designed to be lightweight and simplified, with fewer components and a smaller footprint. It aims to provide most of the essential Kubernetes functionalities in a more streamlined manner.
Resource Requirements: Another significant difference is the resource requirements. Kubernetes usually requires a larger amount of system resources like CPU and memory to operate efficiently. On the contrary, k3s is optimized for resource-constrained environments and can run smoothly even on devices with limited resources, such as edge devices or Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
Ease of Installation and Setup: Kubernetes requires a thorough installation and setup process, involving several steps and configurations. It can be quite complex, especially for beginners. On the other hand, k3s offers a simplified installation process, making it easier to get started. It provides a lightweight, all-in-one binary that can be easily installed with a single command, reducing the setup time and complexity.
Security Features: Kubernetes has robust security features and supports advanced authentication and authorization mechanisms. It provides secure communication channels and enforces strong access controls. K3s, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and ease of use over advanced security features. While it includes the essential security measures, it may not have all the advanced security capabilities that are present in Kubernetes.
Plugin Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a robust plugin ecosystem, with a wide range of plugins available for different functionalities such as networking, storage, and logging. These plugins can enhance the capabilities of the platform and provide additional features. K3s, being a lightweight version, may not have the same extensive plugin ecosystem as Kubernetes. Some plugins may not be compatible with k3s or require additional configurations.
Community Support: Kubernetes has a large and active community of users and contributors, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and online resources available. It is widely adopted and has a vibrant ecosystem. K3s, being a relatively new project, may not have the same level of community support and resources. However, as it gains popularity, the community support for k3s is expected to grow.
In summary, Kubernetes is a powerful and feature-rich container orchestration platform with a complex architecture and extensive capabilities, while k3s is a lightweight and simplified version of Kubernetes, optimized for resource-constrained environments and ease of use.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of k3s
- Lightweight6
- Easy4
- Replication Controller2
- Scale Services2
- Open Source2
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of k3s
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1