StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. JSON Web Token vs OAuth2

JSON Web Token vs OAuth2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374

JSON Web Token vs OAuth2: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide a comparison between JSON Web Token (JWT) and OAuth2. The key differences between these two are outlined below.

  1. Scalability: JSON Web Tokens (JWT) are self-contained, meaning that all the relevant information is included in the token itself. This makes them highly scalable as there is no need to query the server every time to verify the token. On the other hand, OAuth2 relies on tokens that are stored on the server-side and need to be queried each time a request is made, causing additional overhead and impacting scalability.

  2. Token Generation: JWTs are generated by the server and include the necessary information to verify their authenticity, such as a digital signature. OAuth2, on the other hand, relies on access and refresh tokens generated by the authorization server. These tokens need to be requested and validated by a separate entity, which adds an extra step in the authentication process.

  3. Scope of Authorization: OAuth2 provides a much finer-grained authorization mechanism by allowing the specification of different scopes for each access token. These scopes determine the level of access granted to a client application. In contrast, JWTs provide broader and more general authorization capabilities, as all the relevant information is already present in the token itself.

  4. Token Expiration: JWTs have the option to include an expiration time, which allows for more granular control over their validity. This means that the server can specify the exact duration for which a JWT is considered valid and enforce stricter security measures. OAuth2, on the other hand, relies on short-lived access tokens and long-lived refresh tokens. The expiration time for these tokens is determined by the server and poses a potential security risk if not managed properly.

  5. Token Revocation: In OAuth2, access and refresh tokens can be easily revoked by the authorization server, allowing fine-grained control over the access granted to client applications. JWTs, however, do not have a built-in revocation mechanism. Once a JWT is issued, it remains valid until it expires, which may pose a challenge when it comes to revoking access for a specific client.

  6. Usage Pattern: JWTs are commonly used for authentication purposes, where the token itself contains information about the user and their permissions. OAuth2, on the other hand, is primarily used for authorization, allowing third-party applications to access resources on behalf of the user, without explicitly sharing credentials.

In summary, the key differences between JSON Web Token (JWT) and OAuth2 lie in their scalability, token generation process, scope of authorization, token expiration, token revocation mechanism, and usage pattern.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OAuth2
OAuth2
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

-
compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
374
Stacks
683
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
650
Followers
367
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to OAuth2, JSON Web Token?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope