StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Vaadin vs jsf

Vaadin vs jsf

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks198
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81
JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers223
Votes4

Vaadin vs jsf: What are the differences?

Vaadin vs JSF: Key Differences in Web Application Development

Vaadin and JSF are both frameworks used for building web applications. While they share similarities, there are several key differences between the two. Here are the six main points of distinction:

  1. Component-based vs Request-based Architecture: Vaadin utilizes a component-based architecture, where the UI components are created and managed on the server-side. In contrast, JSF follows a request-based architecture, where each request from the client triggers a new server request and the UI components are rendered again. This fundamental architectural difference impacts the development workflow and performance characteristics of the frameworks.

  2. Server-Driven vs Client-Driven Updates: In Vaadin, the server handles most of the UI rendering and event handling, reducing the need for custom JavaScript code on the client-side. On the other hand, JSF primarily relies on JavaScript and AJAX techniques to update the UI on the client-side, leading to more client-driven interactions. This distinction affects the developer's control over the UI updates and the complexity of implementing dynamic UI behaviors.

  3. Out-of-the-Box Component Set: Vaadin offers a comprehensive set of pre-built UI components that cover a wide range of use cases, including grids, forms, charts, and more. JSF, while extensible, does not provide an extensive out-of-the-box component set, relying more on third-party libraries and custom development for specific UI components. Therefore, Vaadin provides a more streamlined development experience with ready-to-use components.

  4. Java-Centric vs Language-Agnostic: Vaadin, being Java-centric, promotes full-stack web development using only Java, allowing developers to leverage existing Java knowledge and libraries. In contrast, JSF is a language-agnostic framework that supports different programming languages, including Java, Kotlin, Groovy, and more. This difference makes Vaadin a preferred choice for Java developers, while JSF offers flexibility for developers working with other programming languages.

  5. Client-Side Rendering vs Server-Side Rendering: Vaadin's primary rendering occurs on the server-side, where the UI components are translated into HTML and sent to the client browser. JSF, on the other hand, focuses on server-side UI component handling while rendering the actual HTML on the client-side using JavaScript. This distinction impacts the initial page load time, network traffic, and the ability to render dynamic UI parts efficiently.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: JSF has been around for longer and has a larger community and ecosystem, with numerous third-party libraries, tools, and resources available. Vaadin, though growing steadily, has a smaller community and ecosystem comparatively. This difference affects the availability of support, documentation, and ready-made solutions for different development challenges.

In summary, Vaadin and JSF offer different approaches to web application development. Vaadin follows a component-based architecture with server-driven updates and a rich out-of-the-box component set, while JSF utilizes a request-based architecture with client-driven updates and a more flexible, language-agnostic approach. Developers need to consider the specific requirements of their projects and their familiarity with Java or other languages to choose the most suitable framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vaadin
Vaadin
JSF
JSF

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Statistics
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
81
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
198
Stacks
138
Followers
279
Followers
223
Votes
36
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
  • 1
    Server Side component
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to Vaadin, JSF?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase