YUI Library vs jQuery

Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

YUI Library

Stacks1.8K

Followers25

Votes0

YUI Library vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. Syntax: The syntax used in YUI Library and jQuery differs significantly. In YUI, the syntax is more verbose and tends to be more object-oriented, with the library providing a set of methods and properties for manipulating the DOM. On the other hand, jQuery uses a concise syntax that simplifies DOM traversal and manipulation, with the library taking care of handling cross-browser compatibility.
2. Plugin Architecture: YUI Library has a built-in module system that allows developers to load only the required components, resulting in efficient resource management. jQuery, on the other hand, does not have a native module system but relies heavily on plugins. jQuery's plugin architecture allows for easy extension of functionality, with a vast ecosystem of community-contributed plugins available.
3. Performance: YUI Library focuses on performance and is known for its optimized code and efficient rendering. It emphasizes on minimizing network requests and improving caching strategies to enhance the overall performance of web applications. jQuery, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use and simplicity over performance. It may not be as performant as YUI in certain scenarios, but it provides a more straightforward approach to web development.
4. Community and Support: jQuery has a larger community and a broader user base compared to YUI Library. The extensive community support for jQuery means that finding help, tutorials, and examples is easier, and troubleshooting issues is more straightforward. YUI Library, while still having a dedicated user base, may have limited community support in comparison.
5. Size and Footprint: YUI Library is a larger library compared to jQuery, which may impact the page load time and overall performance of the website. jQuery, with its smaller size and efficient code structure, is often preferred when considering the page size and download speed.
6. Browser Compatibility: YUI Library aims to provide consistent functionality across various browsers, including older versions. It may have better compatibility with legacy browsers compared to jQuery. jQuery, on the other hand, prioritizes compatibility with modern browsers and may not provide as extensive support for older browsers as YUI Library does.

In Summary, YUI Library and jQuery differ in syntax, plugin architecture, performance, community support, library size, and browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on jQuery, YUI Library

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k

Comments

Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	YUI Library
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	It is a free, open source JavaScript and CSS library for building richly interactive web applications. Its lightweight core and modular architecture make it scalable, fast, and robust.
-	Lightweight core and modular architecture ;Scalable, fast, and robust; Intuitive and well-documented API; Free for all uses
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 1.8K
Followers 70.6K	Followers 25
Votes 6.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript CSS 3

What are some alternatives to jQuery, YUI Library?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

YUI Library vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. Syntax: The syntax used in YUI Library and jQuery differs significantly. In YUI, the syntax is more verbose and tends to be more object-oriented, with the library providing a set of methods and properties for manipulating the DOM. On the other hand, jQuery uses a concise syntax that simplifies DOM traversal and manipulation, with the library taking care of handling cross-browser compatibility.
2. Plugin Architecture: YUI Library has a built-in module system that allows developers to load only the required components, resulting in efficient resource management. jQuery, on the other hand, does not have a native module system but relies heavily on plugins. jQuery's plugin architecture allows for easy extension of functionality, with a vast ecosystem of community-contributed plugins available.
3. Performance: YUI Library focuses on performance and is known for its optimized code and efficient rendering. It emphasizes on minimizing network requests and improving caching strategies to enhance the overall performance of web applications. jQuery, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use and simplicity over performance. It may not be as performant as YUI in certain scenarios, but it provides a more straightforward approach to web development.
4. Community and Support: jQuery has a larger community and a broader user base compared to YUI Library. The extensive community support for jQuery means that finding help, tutorials, and examples is easier, and troubleshooting issues is more straightforward. YUI Library, while still having a dedicated user base, may have limited community support in comparison.
5. Size and Footprint: YUI Library is a larger library compared to jQuery, which may impact the page load time and overall performance of the website. jQuery, with its smaller size and efficient code structure, is often preferred when considering the page size and download speed.
6. Browser Compatibility: YUI Library aims to provide consistent functionality across various browsers, including older versions. It may have better compatibility with legacy browsers compared to jQuery. jQuery, on the other hand, prioritizes compatibility with modern browsers and may not provide as extensive support for older browsers as YUI Library does.

In Summary, YUI Library and jQuery differ in syntax, plugin architecture, performance, community support, library size, and browser compatibility.

YUI Library vs jQuery

Overview