Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Prototype vs jQuery: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In web development, both Prototype and jQuery are widely used JavaScript libraries that provide a range of functions and tools to simplify and enhance the process of creating websites. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore six of these differences in detail.
Syntax: One of the primary differences between Prototype and jQuery is the syntax they use. Prototype follows a more traditional JavaScript syntax, whereas jQuery utilizes a more concise and simplified syntax. This makes jQuery code easier to read and write, especially for developers who are new to JavaScript.
Size and Performance: Another notable difference between Prototype and jQuery is the size and performance of the libraries. Prototype is relatively larger in size compared to jQuery, which means it might take longer to load and parse. On the other hand, jQuery is designed to be lightweight and focuses on performance optimization, making it a better choice for websites with a need for fast loading times.
DOM Manipulation: Both Prototype and jQuery offer methods for DOM manipulation, allowing developers to interact with HTML elements on a web page. However, the approaches differ slightly. Prototype provides a more object-oriented approach to DOM manipulation, while jQuery offers a more concise and intuitive syntax, making it easier to select and manipulate DOM elements.
Browser Compatibility: Another significant difference between Prototype and jQuery is their level of browser compatibility. Prototype is compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions, but it may require additional workarounds to ensure smooth functionality. On the other hand, jQuery is known for its excellent cross-browser compatibility and handles inconsistencies across browsers more seamlessly.
Plugin Ecosystem: jQuery has a massive plugin ecosystem, which means there are numerous pre-built plugins available that extend its functionality. These plugins can quickly be integrated into jQuery projects, saving development time and effort. Prototype, on the other hand, has a more limited plugin ecosystem, so developers may need to build certain functionalities from scratch.
Community and Documentation: Both Prototype and jQuery have active communities, but jQuery has a significantly larger and more active user base. This means there is a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and resources available for jQuery, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and keep up with the latest updates. Prototype, while still supported, may have fewer resources available and a smaller community to rely on.
In Summary, Prototype and jQuery differ in syntax, size, performance, DOM manipulation approach, browser compatibility, plugin ecosystem, and community support. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and cater to different developer preferences.
I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.
I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of Prototype
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2