StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Prototype vs jQuery

Prototype vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Prototype
Prototype
Stacks2.4K
Followers31
Votes0

Prototype vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In web development, both Prototype and jQuery are widely used JavaScript libraries that provide a range of functions and tools to simplify and enhance the process of creating websites. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore six of these differences in detail.

  1. Syntax: One of the primary differences between Prototype and jQuery is the syntax they use. Prototype follows a more traditional JavaScript syntax, whereas jQuery utilizes a more concise and simplified syntax. This makes jQuery code easier to read and write, especially for developers who are new to JavaScript.

  2. Size and Performance: Another notable difference between Prototype and jQuery is the size and performance of the libraries. Prototype is relatively larger in size compared to jQuery, which means it might take longer to load and parse. On the other hand, jQuery is designed to be lightweight and focuses on performance optimization, making it a better choice for websites with a need for fast loading times.

  3. DOM Manipulation: Both Prototype and jQuery offer methods for DOM manipulation, allowing developers to interact with HTML elements on a web page. However, the approaches differ slightly. Prototype provides a more object-oriented approach to DOM manipulation, while jQuery offers a more concise and intuitive syntax, making it easier to select and manipulate DOM elements.

  4. Browser Compatibility: Another significant difference between Prototype and jQuery is their level of browser compatibility. Prototype is compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions, but it may require additional workarounds to ensure smooth functionality. On the other hand, jQuery is known for its excellent cross-browser compatibility and handles inconsistencies across browsers more seamlessly.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: jQuery has a massive plugin ecosystem, which means there are numerous pre-built plugins available that extend its functionality. These plugins can quickly be integrated into jQuery projects, saving development time and effort. Prototype, on the other hand, has a more limited plugin ecosystem, so developers may need to build certain functionalities from scratch.

  6. Community and Documentation: Both Prototype and jQuery have active communities, but jQuery has a significantly larger and more active user base. This means there is a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and resources available for jQuery, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and keep up with the latest updates. Prototype, while still supported, may have fewer resources available and a smaller community to rely on.

In Summary, Prototype and jQuery differ in syntax, size, performance, DOM manipulation approach, browser compatibility, plugin ecosystem, and community support. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and cater to different developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, Prototype

Peter
Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

72.5k views72.5k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
Prototype
Prototype

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Prototype is a JavaScript framework that aims to ease development of dynamic web applications. It offers a familiar class-style OO framework, extensive Ajax support, higher-order programming constructs, and easy DOM manipulation.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
70.6K
Followers
31
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Prototype?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase