StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. jQuery vs momentjs

jQuery vs momentjs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Moment.js
Moment.js
Stacks7.4K
Followers297
Votes0
GitHub Stars48.1K
Forks7.0K

jQuery vs momentjs: What are the differences?

Introduction

jQuery and momentjs are both popular JavaScript libraries used for manipulating and interacting with dates and time. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Syntax and Ease of Use: jQuery focuses on simplifying and optimizing the process of selecting and manipulating HTML elements in webpages, while momentjs is solely dedicated to handling and formatting dates and time. jQuery provides an easy-to-use syntax for traversing and manipulating the DOM, while momentjs offers a comprehensive set of methods for handling date and time-related operations.

  2. Size and Performance: jQuery is a larger library compared to momentjs, which means it requires more bandwidth to load on a webpage. On the other hand, momentjs is a lightweight library specifically designed for efficient date and time manipulation. This can result in faster page loading times when using momentjs compared to jQuery.

  3. Functionality: jQuery provides a wide range of features beyond date and time manipulation, such as AJAX requests, animations, and event handling. In contrast, momentjs focuses solely on date and time manipulation, offering a rich set of methods for parsing, formatting, manipulating, and comparing dates and times without the additional functionalities provided by jQuery.

  4. Localization and Internationalization: momentjs has built-in support for localization and internationalization, allowing developers to easily format dates and times in different languages and regions. It provides customizable locale settings, including date and time formats, week start day, and month names. jQuery does not provide built-in localization support for dates and times.

  5. Accessibility: jQuery is widely used and has a vast community of developers, which means it has extensive accessibility features and resources available. In contrast, momentjs is a specialized library focused on date and time operations, so it may not have the same level of accessibility support as jQuery.

  6. Browser Compatibility: jQuery is designed to be compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions. It provides a consistent API across different browsers, ensuring consistent behavior. On the other hand, momentjs has fewer browser compatibility concerns since it focuses solely on date and time manipulation. However, it may still have some browser compatibility issues, especially in older or less commonly used browsers.

In summary, jQuery and momentjs are both powerful JavaScript libraries, but they have distinct focuses and functionalities. jQuery is primarily used for general DOM manipulation and includes features beyond date and time manipulation, while momentjs is dedicated solely to handling and formatting dates and times. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the need for additional functionalities beyond date and time operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, Moment.js

Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments
Manatsawin
Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
Moment.js
Moment.js

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

A javascript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
48.1K
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
7.0K
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
7.4K
Followers
70.6K
Followers
297
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Moment.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase