StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Vanilla.JS vs jQuery UI

Vanilla.JS vs jQuery UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Vanilla.JS vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Vanilla.JS and jQuery UI.

1. **Syntax**: Vanilla.JS uses plain JavaScript syntax while jQuery UI is a library built on top of jQuery, providing its own syntax and methods. 
2. **DOM Manipulation**: Vanilla.JS allows direct manipulation of the DOM through JavaScript while jQuery UI simplifies DOM manipulation with its built-in methods like `.append()`, `.remove()`, etc.
3. **File Size**: Vanilla.JS is a lightweight library as it consists of pure JavaScript code leading to smaller file sizes, whereas jQuery UI is a larger library due to the additional functionalities it offers.
4. **Browser Compatibility**: Vanilla.JS ensures better browser compatibility as it solely relies on standard JavaScript features, whereas jQuery UI might have more consistent behavior across different browsers due to its abstraction layer.
5. **Learning Curve**: Vanilla.JS is the fundamental JavaScript language, making it essential for developers to have a strong understanding of JavaScript concepts, while jQuery UI provides a higher level of abstraction making it easier to learn and use for beginners.
6. **Performance**: Vanilla.JS may have better performance since it directly interacts with the browser's native functionality, whereas jQuery UI may introduce some overhead due to its library functions.

In Summary, the key differences between Vanilla.JS and jQuery UI lie in syntax, DOM manipulation, file size, browser compatibility, learning curve, and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
82
Followers
13.3K
Followers
85
Votes
899
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    Faster than any framework
  • 1
    No buildtool overhead
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase