StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Jinja2 vs Mustache

Jinja2 vs Mustache

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K
Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K

Jinja2 vs Mustache: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jinja2 and Mustache are both popular templating engines used for web development. While they have similarities in their core functionality, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Syntax: Jinja2 is a powerful templating language that provides a wide range of features and control structures. It has a more complex syntax that allows for more advanced logic and programming constructs. On the other hand, Mustache has a simpler syntax with a limited set of features, making it easier to understand and use.

  2. Extensibility: Jinja2 allows for more extensibility by providing various built-in functions, filters, and extensions. It also allows developers to define their own custom filters and functions, making it highly adaptable to different use cases. Mustache, on the other hand, has a limited set of built-in functions and does not support custom filters or extensions. This makes it less flexible in terms of extending its functionality.

  3. Usage: Jinja2 is primarily used in Python web frameworks such as Flask and Django. It seamlessly integrates with these frameworks and provides advanced features like template inheritance and macro definitions. Mustache, on the other hand, is a language-agnostic templating engine that can be used with a wide range of programming languages. It follows a "logic-less" approach and focuses on simplicity and portability.

  4. Template Inheritance: Jinja2 supports template inheritance, allowing developers to create base templates and extend them with additional content. This feature is useful when building complex web applications with multiple pages that share common elements. Mustache, on the other hand, does not support template inheritance, making it less suitable for building large-scale web applications with complex layouts.

  5. Conditional Statements: Jinja2 provides a rich set of control structures and conditional statements, allowing developers to write complex logic within the templates. This includes if statements, for loops, and advanced control flow constructs. Mustache, on the other hand, has a limited set of control structures and does not support complex conditional statements. It follows a "logic-less" approach, focusing on simplicity and readability.

  6. Whitespace Control: Jinja2 provides more control over whitespace handling within templates. It allows developers to specify whether to strip leading and trailing whitespace or keep it intact. This can be useful for controlling the formatting and rendering of HTML elements. Mustache, on the other hand, does not provide explicit control over whitespace handling, and the rendering of whitespace is determined by the rendering engine.

In summary, Jinja2 is a powerful and flexible templating engine primarily used in Python web frameworks, offering advanced features, extensibility, and control over whitespace handling. Mustache, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more portable approach, focusing on simplicity and logic-less templates, making it suitable for a wide range of programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mustache
Mustache
Jinja
Jinja

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

-
Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
415
Followers
292
Votes
50
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Mustache, Jinja?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Jsonnet

Jsonnet

It is a data templating language for app and tool developers. It is a powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase