Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jekyll vs Read the Docs: What are the differences?
Introduction: This Markdown code focuses on highlighting the key differences between Jekyll and Read the Docs, two popular tools used for website documentation.
Design and Structure: Jekyll allows users to create static websites using templates and Markdown, giving full control over the design. On the other hand, Read the Docs primarily focuses on hosting and deploying documentation that is automatically generated from your codebase, offering limited customization in terms of design.
Hosting Environment: Jekyll requires hosting on a web server to serve its static content, allowing for greater flexibility in terms of hosting options. In contrast, Read the Docs hosts documentation directly on their platform, simplifying the hosting process but limiting control over the hosting environment.
Workflow Automation: Jekyll provides a command-line interface to build and deploy the website, allowing for automation of the build process through scripts or CI/CD pipelines. Read the Docs, on the other hand, automatically builds documentation from code repositories whenever changes are pushed, reducing the need for manual intervention in the deployment process.
Support for Multiple Languages: Jekyll supports multilingual websites through plugins or custom configurations, enabling the creation of documentation in different languages within the same site. Read the Docs also supports multiple languages but may require additional setup and configuration to achieve the same result as Jekyll.
Community and Ecosystem: Jekyll has a strong community of developers and a wide range of plugins and themes available for customizing websites, providing a rich ecosystem for users to leverage. Read the Docs also has a supportive community but may offer fewer customization options compared to Jekyll, especially in terms of design and layout.
Integration with Version Control: Jekyll seamlessly integrates with version control systems like Git, allowing users to track changes to their website content and collaborate with team members effectively. Read the Docs also integrates with version control but focuses more on automating the deployment of documentation rather than managing website content changes.
In Summary, Jekyll and Read the Docs differ in design and structure, hosting environment, workflow automation, support for multiple languages, community, and integration with version control systems, offering distinct advantages and limitations for website documentation projects.
As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML
or Markdown
(what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.
Pros of Jekyll
- Github pages integration74
- Open source54
- It's slick, customisable and hackerish37
- Easy to deploy24
- Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset23
- Gitlab pages integration7
- Best for blogging5
- Low maintenance2
- Easy to integrate localization2
- Huge plugins ecosystem1
- Authoring freedom and simplicity1
Pros of Read the Docs
- GitHub integration13
- Free for public repos7
- Automated Builds2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jekyll
- Build time increases exponentially as site grows4
- Lack of developments lately2
- Og doesn't work with postings dynamically1