StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. JavaScript vs PureScript

JavaScript vs PureScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JavaScript
JavaScript
Stacks392.3K
Followers284.0K
Votes8.1K
PureScript
PureScript
Stacks88
Followers86
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks569

JavaScript vs PureScript: What are the differences?

<JavaScript and PureScript are both programming languages used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here, we will explore these differences in detail.>

  1. Type System: One of the significant differences between JavaScript and PureScript is the type system. JavaScript is dynamically typed, meaning that variable types are determined at runtime, leading to potential errors. On the other hand, PureScript is statically typed, where types are checked at compile time, reducing the chances of runtime errors. This difference makes PureScript more robust and safer for building complex applications.

  2. Functional Programming: While JavaScript supports functional programming to some extent, PureScript is designed purely for functional programming. PureScript encourages immutability, higher-order functions, and declarative programming paradigms, making it more suitable for building scalable and maintainable code bases compared to JavaScript.

  3. Tooling: The tooling support for PureScript is more sophisticated compared to JavaScript. PureScript tools like psc-package, Pulp, and PureScript IDE provide better project management, dependency resolution, and editor support, making development easier and more efficient. JavaScript, on the other hand, relies heavily on third-party tools and libraries for similar functionalities.

  4. JavaScript Interoperability: PureScript can seamlessly interoperate with JavaScript code, allowing developers to leverage existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks. The foreign function interface (FFI) in PureScript enables easy integration with JavaScript, making it easier to transition existing projects or use specific JavaScript functionalities where needed.

  5. Performance: PureScript tends to offer better performance compared to JavaScript due to its statically typed nature and strict type checking at compile time. This can result in optimized code execution and memory management, making PureScript a preferred choice for performance-critical applications compared to JavaScript.

  6. Learning Curve: Due to its functional programming nature and stricter type system, learning PureScript might be more challenging for developers who are accustomed to JavaScript. While JavaScript is more forgiving and flexible, PureScript's syntax and concepts can require a steeper learning curve for those new to the language.

In Summary, JavaScript and PureScript differ in their type system, functional programming support, tooling, JavaScript interoperability, performance, and learning curve, making each language suitable for different use cases in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JavaScript, PureScript

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Muhamed
Muhamed

Apr 28, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptDjangoDjango

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

737k views737k
Comments
William
William

Senior Platform Engineer at ABN AMRO

Jul 17, 2020

Decided

Telegram Messenger has frameworks for most known languages, which makes easier for anyone to integrate with them. I started with Golang and soon found that those frameworks are not up to date, not to mention my experience testing on Golang is also mixed due to how their testing tool works. The natural runner-up was JS, which I'm ditching in favor of TS to make a strongly typed code, proper tests and documentation for broader usage. TypeScript allows fast prototyping and can prevent problems during code phase, given that your IDE of choice has support for a language server, and build phase. Pairing it with lint tools also allows honing code before it even hits the repositories.

409k views409k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JavaScript
JavaScript
PureScript
PureScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
569
Stacks
392.3K
Stacks
88
Followers
284.0K
Followers
86
Votes
8.1K
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1670
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1497
    It's everywhere
  • 1163
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
Cons
  • 24
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 16
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
Pros
  • 6
    Purely functional
  • 4
    Great FFI to JavaScript
  • 2
    Alternate backends
  • 2
    The best type system
  • 1
    Coherent type classes
Cons
  • 1
    Not so fancy error reporting
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Have Some Bugs

What are some alternatives to JavaScript, PureScript?

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot