StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. JavaScript vs OCaml

JavaScript vs OCaml

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JavaScript
JavaScript
Stacks392.2K
Followers284.0K
Votes8.1K
OCaml
OCaml
Stacks321
Followers186
Votes28

JavaScript vs OCaml: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between JavaScript and OCaml. Both are popular programming languages used in different domains, and understanding their differences can help in making informed decisions for choosing the right language for specific purposes.

  1. Syntax and Paradigm: JavaScript is a dynamically-typed, weakly-typed language with imperative and functional programming paradigms. It has a C-like syntax, which is easy to understand for beginners. On the other hand, OCaml is a statically-typed, strongly-typed language with purely functional programming paradigms. It follows a syntax that is closer to mathematical notations and requires a deeper understanding of functional programming concepts.

  2. Type System: JavaScript has a dynamic type system, where variables can hold values of any type and can be changed at runtime. It allows implicit type conversions, which can sometimes lead to unexpected results. OCaml, on the other hand, has a static type system that checks types during compile-time and provides type safety. It requires explicit type annotations and enforces strict adherence to types, reducing the chances of runtime errors.

  3. Memory Management: JavaScript uses automatic memory management through a garbage collector. Objects that are no longer referenced are automatically removed from memory. This simplifies memory management for developers but can sometimes lead to memory leaks if references are not handled properly. In contrast, OCaml uses a combination of automatic garbage collection and manual memory management through the use of a global root stack. This allows more control over memory allocations and deallocations, but also requires careful handling to avoid memory leaks.

  4. Concurrency and Multithreading: JavaScript is a single-threaded language, meaning it can only execute one task at a time. However, it supports asynchronous programming through the use of callbacks, promises, and async/await. OCaml, on the other hand, supports lightweight threads called "cooperative threads" that can be scheduled and executed concurrently. It provides better support for parallelism and allows for efficient utilization of multiple processors or cores.

  5. Standard Libraries and Ecosystem: JavaScript has a vast array of libraries and frameworks available, making it easy to find ready-made solutions for various tasks. It has a mature ecosystem with extensive community support and resources. OCaml, although not as widely adopted as JavaScript, also has a rich set of libraries and tools available for various domains such as functional programming, system programming, and compiler construction. However, the ecosystem is more specialized and targeted towards specific use cases.

  6. Platform and Browser Compatibility: JavaScript is primarily used for client-side scripting in web browsers, making it the default choice for web development. It is well supported by all major browsers, making it highly compatible across different platforms. OCaml, on the other hand, is a general-purpose programming language that can be used for a wide range of applications, including web development. However, its usage on the web is limited compared to JavaScript, and it may require additional setup and configuration to run in a browser environment.

In summary, the key differences between JavaScript and OCaml lie in their syntax, type systems, memory management, concurrency models, ecosystem, and platform compatibility. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the most suitable language for their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JavaScript, OCaml

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Muhamed
Muhamed

Apr 28, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptDjangoDjango

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

737k views737k
Comments
William
William

Senior Platform Engineer at ABN AMRO

Jul 17, 2020

Decided

Telegram Messenger has frameworks for most known languages, which makes easier for anyone to integrate with them. I started with Golang and soon found that those frameworks are not up to date, not to mention my experience testing on Golang is also mixed due to how their testing tool works. The natural runner-up was JS, which I'm ditching in favor of TS to make a strongly typed code, proper tests and documentation for broader usage. TypeScript allows fast prototyping and can prevent problems during code phase, given that your IDE of choice has support for a language server, and build phase. Pairing it with lint tools also allows honing code before it even hits the repositories.

409k views409k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JavaScript
JavaScript
OCaml
OCaml

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

It is an industrial strength programming language supporting functional, imperative and object-oriented styles. It is the technology of choice in companies where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters,

-
functional style; imperative style; object-oriented style
Statistics
Stacks
392.2K
Stacks
321
Followers
284.0K
Followers
186
Votes
8.1K
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1670
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1497
    It's everywhere
  • 1163
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
Cons
  • 24
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 16
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
Pros
  • 7
    Satisfying to write
  • 6
    Pattern matching
  • 4
    Very practical
  • 4
    Also has OOP
  • 3
    Extremely powerful type inference
Cons
  • 3
    Small community
  • 1
    Royal pain in the neck to compile large programs
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to JavaScript, OCaml?

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase