StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. JaCoCo vs SwiftLint

JaCoCo vs SwiftLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JaCoCo
JaCoCo
Stacks223
Followers82
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks1.2K
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
Stacks156
Followers105
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.3K
Forks2.3K

JaCoCo vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Code coverage vs. code style checking JaCoCo is a code coverage tool that measures how much of the code is being tested, while SwiftLint is a code style checking tool that enforces a set of predefined coding style rules.
  2. Key difference 2: Language support JaCoCo is primarily used for code coverage analysis in Java and other JVM languages, while SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift, a programming language used for iOS and macOS app development.
  3. Key difference 3: Reporting JaCoCo generates code coverage reports in various formats like HTML, XML, and CSV, providing detailed insights into the coverage data. SwiftLint, on the other hand, produces reports in plain text and can be integrated with other tools for further analysis.
  4. Key difference 4: Integration with build process JaCoCo integrates seamlessly with build systems like Maven and Gradle, allowing code coverage analysis to be executed automatically during the build process. SwiftLint can also be integrated into the build process but requires additional configuration and setup.
  5. Key difference 5: Rules vs. metrics SwiftLint focuses on enforcing code style rules, while JaCoCo measures code coverage as a metric. While JaCoCo provides insights into which parts of the code are being tested, SwiftLint helps ensure that code adheres to a certain style standard.
  6. Key difference 6: Flexibility and customization JaCoCo offers a wide range of configuration options, allowing users to customize coverage analysis based on specific criteria or requirements. SwiftLint, although customizable to some extent, has a more limited set of configuration options compared to JaCoCo.

In summary, JaCoCo is a code coverage tool primarily used for Java and JVM languages, providing detailed insights into test coverage, while SwiftLint is a code style checking tool specifically designed for Swift, enforcing coding style rules for iOS and macOS app development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JaCoCo
JaCoCo
SwiftLint
SwiftLint

It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.

It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.

-
automatically correct certain violations; supports nesting configuration files
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Stars
19.3K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
223
Stacks
156
Followers
82
Followers
105
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Xcode
Xcode
Jenkins
Jenkins
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to JaCoCo, SwiftLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana