StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. InfluxDB vs Zabbix

InfluxDB vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175
Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K

InfluxDB vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction:

InfluxDB and Zabbix are two popular tools used for monitoring and managing systems. While both have similar goals, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Data storage model: InfluxDB is a time-series database designed specifically for handling time-based data. It is optimized for storing and querying large amounts of time-stamped data. On the other hand, Zabbix uses a relational database to store its data, which makes it more suitable for handling various types of data beyond just time-stamped measurements.

  2. Monitoring capabilities: Zabbix provides a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities, including monitoring network devices, servers, applications, and cloud resources. It supports a wide range of monitoring methods such as agent-based, agentless, and SNMP. InfluxDB, on the other hand, focuses primarily on collecting, storing, and querying time-series data, making it more suitable for monitoring and analyzing metrics and events rather than the overall health of a system.

  3. Scalability: InfluxDB is designed to handle high volumes of time-series data and provides built-in mechanisms for horizontal scalability. It supports clustering and sharding, allowing it to handle large-scale deployments. Zabbix, while scalable to some extent, may require additional configurations to achieve the same level of scalability as InfluxDB.

  4. User interface and visualization: Zabbix provides a feature-rich web interface that allows users to configure and customize dashboards, graphs, and reports. It offers a wide range of visualization options and supports flexible drill-down capabilities. InfluxDB, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in user interface for visualization. However, it integrates well with other tools like Grafana, which offer powerful visualization and dashboarding capabilities.

  5. Alerting and notification: Zabbix offers advanced alerting and notification capabilities, allowing users to define complex conditions and actions based on monitored data. It supports various notification methods such as email, SMS, and scripts. InfluxDB, on the other hand, does not have built-in alerting capabilities. However, it can integrate with other tools like Kapacitor, which provide advanced alerting and anomaly detection functionalities.

  6. Ease of installation and configuration: Zabbix may require more manual configuration and setup compared to InfluxDB. It has a more complex setup process and requires additional dependencies such as a relational database and a web server. InfluxDB, on the other hand, provides a simple and straightforward installation process with minimal dependencies, making it easier to get started.

In summary, InfluxDB is a powerful time-series database optimized for handling large amounts of time-stamped data, while Zabbix is a comprehensive monitoring tool that offers a wide range of monitoring capabilities beyond just time-series data. InfluxDB focuses more on data storage and querying, while Zabbix provides a feature-rich user interface, extensive alerting capabilities, and a broader scope of monitoring options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on InfluxDB, Zabbix

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Zabbix
Zabbix

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
684
Followers
1.2K
Followers
981
Votes
175
Votes
66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Templates
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com

What are some alternatives to InfluxDB, Zabbix?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot