StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Spark vs InfluxDB

Apache Spark vs InfluxDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K

Apache Spark vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Apache Spark and InfluxDB.

  1. Scalability and Workloads: Apache Spark is designed for processing and analyzing large-scale distributed datasets, making it suitable for big data processing and complex analytics. On the other hand, InfluxDB is a time series database that is optimized for handling time-stamped or time-series data. It excels in storing and retrieving high volumes of time-series data efficiently.

  2. Data Model: Apache Spark supports a flexible data model that allows the processing of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. It can handle a wide range of data formats and structures. In contrast, InfluxDB has a specific data model focused on time-series data. It provides efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data along with built-in support for downsampling and data retention policies.

  3. Real-time Data Processing: Apache Spark provides real-time stream processing capabilities through its Spark Streaming module. It can process continuous streams of data in real-time and apply transformations on the fly. InfluxDB, on the other hand, is optimized for high-speed ingestion and querying of time-series data, making it ideal for real-time monitoring and analytics scenarios.

  4. Analytics Capabilities: Apache Spark offers a rich set of built-in analytics and machine learning libraries. It provides a wide range of algorithms and tools for data exploration, statistical analysis, and machine learning. InfluxDB, on the other hand, primarily focuses on efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data. While it doesn't provide built-in analytics capabilities like Spark, it can be integrated with other tools for performing analytics on the stored time-series data.

  5. Data Processing Paradigm: Apache Spark supports various data processing paradigms, including batch processing, interactive queries, streaming, and machine learning. It provides a unified programming model for all these paradigms. InfluxDB, on the other hand, is primarily focused on time-series data processing and doesn't support other paradigms like batch processing or machine learning out of the box.

  6. Ecosystem and Integration: Apache Spark has a vibrant and extensive ecosystem with support for various connectors, libraries, and tools. It can seamlessly integrate with other big data technologies like Hadoop, HBase, Kafka, etc. InfluxDB, while not as extensive as Spark's ecosystem, provides integrations with popular tools like Grafana for data visualization and Kapacitor for real-time data processing.

In summary, Apache Spark is a versatile big data processing platform with support for various data types and processing paradigms, while InfluxDB is a specialized time-series database optimized for efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on InfluxDB, Apache Spark

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
28.9K
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
3.1K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
3.5K
Votes
175
Votes
140
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed

What are some alternatives to InfluxDB, Apache Spark?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase