Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hugo

1.3K
1.2K
+ 1
206
VuePress

380
418
+ 1
8
Add tool

Hugo vs VuePress: What are the differences?

Introduction

Hugo and VuePress are both static site generators commonly used for building websites. While they share similarities in their purpose of generating static websites, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Flexibility and Customization: One key difference between Hugo and VuePress is the level of flexibility and customization they offer. Hugo, being a general-purpose static site generator, provides more flexibility in terms of themes, templates, and content structure. This allows developers to create highly customized websites tailored to their specific needs. On the other hand, VuePress, being a framework built on top of Vue.js, is more focused on providing a seamless and opinionated experience for creating documentation sites. Although VuePress allows customization to some extent, it may require more effort and expertise compared to Hugo.

  2. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Another significant difference is the ease of use and learning curve associated with Hugo and VuePress. Hugo follows a simple and intuitive approach by utilizing a familiar templating language like Go's syntax. This makes it easier for developers with basic knowledge of HTML and CSS to get started with Hugo quickly. On the contrary, VuePress leverages Vue.js, a JavaScript framework, which may require developers to have a solid understanding of JavaScript and Vue.js concepts. Therefore, VuePress might have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Vue.js.

  3. Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability and performance, Hugo surpasses VuePress due to its speed and efficiency. Hugo is known for its remarkable build speed, allowing it to handle large and complex websites with thousands of pages more efficiently. VuePress, although optimized for performance, may face performance challenges as the website scales due to its underlying Vue.js framework.

  4. Content Management System (CMS) Integration: Hugo offers a wide range of options for integrating with Content Management Systems (CMS) like WordPress, Drupal, and various headless CMS platforms. This makes it easier to manage and update content through a familiar CMS interface. On the other hand, VuePress does not offer native CMS integration out of the box. However, with some additional configurations and customizations, it is possible to integrate VuePress with a CMS.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: In terms of community and ecosystem, Hugo has a larger and more established community compared to VuePress. This leads to a broader selection of themes, plugins, and overall support from the community when using Hugo. VuePress, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem. However, it is supported by the vibrant Vue.js community, which continues to grow.

  6. Project Type and Use Case: The choice between Hugo and VuePress greatly depends on the type of project and use case. As mentioned earlier, Hugo is a general-purpose static site generator suitable for various websites ranging from blogs to complex e-commerce platforms. On the other hand, VuePress excels in creating documentation sites, especially for projects utilizing Vue.js. Its focus on documentation-specific features, such as automatic sidebar generation and markdown syntax highlighting, makes it an excellent choice for documenting APIs, libraries, and large-scale documentation projects.

In summary, Hugo provides more flexibility, scalability, and CMS integration options, with a larger community and ecosystem. On the other hand, VuePress offers a seamless and opinionated experience for creating documentation sites, with a focus on Vue.js projects. Choosing between the two depends on the project requirements, level of customization needed, and familiarity with the underlying technologies.

Advice on Hugo and VuePress
Needs advice
on
GatsbyGatsbyHugoHugo
and
Next.jsNext.js
in

Hi everyone, I'm trying to decide which front-end tool, that will likely use server-side rendering (SSR), in hopes it'll be faster. The end-user will upload a document and they see text output on their screen (like SaaS or microservice). I read that Gatsby can also do SSR. Also want to add a headless CMS that is easy to use.

Backend is in Go. Open to ideas. Thank you.

See more
Replies (2)
Vishal Gupta
Senior Architect at Mindtree Ltd · | 3 upvotes · 26.6K views
Recommends
on
GatsbyGatsbyNext.jsNext.js

If your purpose is plain simply to upload a file which can handle by backend service than Gatsby is good enough assuming you have other content pages which will benefit from faster page loads for those Headless CMS driven pages. But if you have more logical/functional aspects like deciding content/personalization at server side of web application than choose NextJS.

See more
Leonard Daume
CTO - Doing the right things right at QYRAGY GmbH · | 2 upvotes · 5.2K views
Recommends
on
AstroAstroNext.jsNext.js

I have experience with Hugo and Next.js, but not with Gatsby. I would go with Next.js. However, I used Astro for my last project, so I would recommend Astro. Astro is much faster and you can use almost any frontend framework if you need to.

See more
Decisions about Hugo and VuePress
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 161.5K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Hugo
Pros of VuePress
  • 47
    Lightning fast
  • 29
    Single Executable
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 24
    Great development community
  • 23
    Open source
  • 13
    Write in golang
  • 8
    Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
  • 8
    Hacker mindset
  • 7
    LiveReload built in
  • 4
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 4
    Easy to customize themes
  • 4
    Very fast builds
  • 3
    Well documented
  • 3
    Fast builds
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 4
    It's Vue
  • 2
    Created by the vue.js developers
  • 2
    Built in text search feature

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Hugo
Cons of VuePress
  • 4
    No Plugins/Extensions
  • 2
    Template syntax not friendly
  • 1
    Quick builds
  • 3
    Its Vue

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Hugo?

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

What is VuePress?

A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Hugo?
What companies use VuePress?
See which teams inside your own company are using Hugo or VuePress.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Hugo?
What tools integrate with VuePress?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Hugo and VuePress?
Jekyll
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
Hexo
Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
WordPress
The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
MkDocs
It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
Pelican
Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.
See all alternatives