Hugo vs Next.js

Overview

Hugo

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.2K

Votes206

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Hugo vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Cost: One key difference between Hugo and Next.js is the cost. Hugo is an open-source static site generator that is free to use, while Next.js is a framework built on top of React and requires additional hosting costs for server-side rendering or static site generation.
Programming Language: Another important difference is the programming language used. Hugo is built with Go, a statically typed compiled language, while Next.js is built with JavaScript, a dynamically typed scripting language.
Build Process: The build process is also different between Hugo and Next.js. Hugo uses a single command to generate the entire site, making it quick and efficient. On the other hand, Next.js uses a build pipeline and requires the use of webpack or other bundlers to compile and optimize the code.
Performance: Performance is another factor where Hugo and Next.js differ. Hugo generates static HTML files, resulting in fast and efficient websites. Next.js, on the other hand, allows for server-side rendering or static site generation, providing dynamic content and faster load times for the user.
Flexibility: Next.js offers more flexibility when it comes to customization and adding interactivity to the website. With React as its foundation, Next.js allows for more complex front-end functionality and easy integration with other libraries and frameworks.
Content Management: Lastly, the way content is managed differs between Hugo and Next.js. Hugo primarily uses Markdown or other file formats for content creation, while Next.js can integrate with various content management systems, such as headless CMS platforms, enabling easier content editing and collaboration.

In summary, Hugo and Next.js differ in terms of cost, programming language, build process, performance, flexibility, and content management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Hugo, Next.js

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.6k views53.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hugo	Next.js
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.;Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.; Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 1.2K	Followers 5.1K
Votes 206	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
Pros 47 Lightning fast 29 Single Executable 26 Easy setup 24 Great development community 23 Open source Cons 4 No Plugins/Extensions 2 Template syntax not friendly 1 Quick builds	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Markdown Golang	React

What are some alternatives to Hugo, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Hugo vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Cost: One key difference between Hugo and Next.js is the cost. Hugo is an open-source static site generator that is free to use, while Next.js is a framework built on top of React and requires additional hosting costs for server-side rendering or static site generation.
Programming Language: Another important difference is the programming language used. Hugo is built with Go, a statically typed compiled language, while Next.js is built with JavaScript, a dynamically typed scripting language.
Build Process: The build process is also different between Hugo and Next.js. Hugo uses a single command to generate the entire site, making it quick and efficient. On the other hand, Next.js uses a build pipeline and requires the use of webpack or other bundlers to compile and optimize the code.
Performance: Performance is another factor where Hugo and Next.js differ. Hugo generates static HTML files, resulting in fast and efficient websites. Next.js, on the other hand, allows for server-side rendering or static site generation, providing dynamic content and faster load times for the user.
Flexibility: Next.js offers more flexibility when it comes to customization and adding interactivity to the website. With React as its foundation, Next.js allows for more complex front-end functionality and easy integration with other libraries and frameworks.
Content Management: Lastly, the way content is managed differs between Hugo and Next.js. Hugo primarily uses Markdown or other file formats for content creation, while Next.js can integrate with various content management systems, such as headless CMS platforms, enabling easier content editing and collaboration.

In summary, Hugo and Next.js differ in terms of cost, programming language, build process, performance, flexibility, and content management.

Hugo vs Next.js

Overview