StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Hoodie vs Phoenix Framework

Hoodie vs Phoenix Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hoodie
Hoodie
Stacks14
Followers29
Votes16
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.0K
Votes678
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks3.0K

Hoodie vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Developers describe Hoodie as "A fast offline-first architecture for webapps. Super-simple user management & storage. Great for mobile". We want to enable you to build complete web apps in days, without having to worry about backends, databases or servers, all with an open source library that's as simple to use as jQuery. On the other hand, Phoenix Framework is detailed as "Most web frameworks make you choose between speed and a productive environment. Phoenix gives you both". Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Hoodie and Phoenix Framework can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

"JSON" is the primary reason why developers consider Hoodie over the competitors, whereas "High performance" was stated as the key factor in picking Phoenix Framework.

Hoodie and Phoenix Framework are both open source tools. Phoenix Framework with 14K GitHub stars and 1.76K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Hoodie with 3.51K GitHub stars and 314 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hoodie, Phoenix Framework

Jakes
Jakes

Mar 21, 2021

Decided

#rust @{#elixir}|topic:null| So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

284k views284k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hoodie
Hoodie
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework

We want to enable you to build complete web apps in days, without having to worry about backends, databases or servers, all with an open source library that's as simple to use as jQuery.

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Offline by default: Hoodie stores data locally first and syncs them in the background when possible. Great for mobile applications;One-line signup/signin/signout/resend password and other account management functions;Document-based storage with CouchDB: no building database schemas;Event system: easily listen for changes in the data to trigger view updates;JavaScript and JSON on every layer. Even the database queries are JS;Convenient, super simple local dev setup that optionally even configures .dev-domains for you;Deploy to Nodejitsu with minimal effort;Flexible, npm-based plugin system in case you need more capability;Send multi-part emails with attachments from the client
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
14
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
29
Followers
1.0K
Votes
16
Votes
678
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    JSON
  • 4
    Reduces boilerplate
  • 3
    Offline first
  • 2
    Mobile friendly
  • 2
    Open source
Pros
  • 120
    High performance
  • 76
    Super fast
  • 70
    Rapid development
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Erlang VM
Cons
  • 6
    No jobs
  • 5
    Very difficult
Integrations
No integrations available
Elixir
Elixir

What are some alternatives to Hoodie, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase