StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Homebrew vs pip

Homebrew vs pip

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Homebrew
Homebrew
Stacks590
Followers515
Votes3
GitHub Stars45.3K
Forks10.6K
pip
pip
Stacks799
Followers182
Votes3

Homebrew vs pip: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Homebrew and pip

Here are the key differences between Homebrew and pip:

  1. Installation Process: Homebrew is a package manager for macOS that allows users to easily install and manage software packages. It is specifically designed for macOS operating system. On the other hand, pip is a package installer for Python that allows users to install Python packages from the Python Package Index (PyPI). It is used specifically for installing Python packages.

  2. Dependency Management: Homebrew automatically handles dependencies for the software packages it installs. When you install a package using Homebrew, it will also install any necessary dependencies. In contrast, pip does not handle dependencies automatically. You will need to manually install the required dependencies before installing a package using pip.

  3. Platform Support: Homebrew is designed for macOS and focuses on providing a package manager specifically for this operating system. It provides a wide range of software packages specifically tailored for macOS users. On the other hand, pip is a package installer for Python that can be used on multiple platforms, including macOS, Windows, and Linux. It is not limited to macOS and can be used across different operating systems.

  4. Package Availability: Homebrew provides a large repository of software packages that are available for installation. It is well-known for its extensive collection of macOS-specific software packages. In contrast, pip provides access to the Python Package Index (PyPI), which is a central repository of Python packages. It offers a vast collection of Python packages that can be installed using pip.

  5. Package Manager Functionality: Homebrew is a full-featured package manager that allows users to not only install packages but also upgrade, remove, and manage software packages. It provides additional functionality such as searching for packages, listing installed packages, and checking for updates. On the other hand, pip focuses solely on package installation and does not provide extensive package management capabilities.

  6. Command Usage: Homebrew uses its own command-line interface (CLI) for package management. The commands for installing, upgrading, and removing packages are specific to Homebrew. In contrast, pip uses a standard set of commands that are common across different package managers, making it easier to switch between different package managers.

In summary, Homebrew is a package manager specifically designed for macOS, providing extensive package management capabilities and a wide range of macOS-specific software packages. On the other hand, pip is a package installer for Python that can be used across different platforms, focusing on installing Python packages from the Python Package Index.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Homebrew
Homebrew
pip
pip

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
45.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
590
Stacks
799
Followers
515
Followers
182
Votes
3
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Clean, neat, powerful, fast and furious
Pros
  • 3
    Best package management system for python
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
cURL
cURL
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Homebrew, pip?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana