StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. Highland.js vs react-three-fiber

Highland.js vs react-three-fiber

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Highland.js
Highland.js
Stacks0
Followers2
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks147
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber
Stacks52
Followers46
Votes0

Highland.js vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Highland.js and react-three-fiber in terms of key differences.

1. **Core Functionality**: Highland.js focuses on functional programming with streams, emphasizing transformations on data sequences, while react-three-fiber is designed specifically for creating 3D interactive applications using React.
2. **Language Compatibility**: Highland.js is primarily designed for use with JavaScript, providing a functional programming alternative to libraries like RxJS. In contrast, react-three-fiber is based on React, utilizing JSX syntax for creating interactive 3D scenes with Three.js.
3. **Use Cases**: Highland.js is commonly used for asynchronous data processing, such as handling streams of data and events, while react-three-fiber is suitable for developing complex 3D visualizations, virtual reality experiences, and interactive animations within a web environment.
4. **Community Support**: Highland.js has a smaller but dedicated community focused on functional programming paradigms, offering support for stream processing and data manipulation. On the other hand, react-three-fiber benefits from the extensive React community and the robust ecosystem of Three.js, providing a wider range of resources and plugins for 3D web development.
5. **Learning Curve**: Highland.js may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to functional programming concepts, as it requires a different mindset for processing data streams efficiently. In comparison, react-three-fiber leverages the familiarity of React for front-end developers, making it easier to adopt for those already experienced with building web applications using React components.
6. **Performance Optimization**: Highland.js is optimized for handling large data streams efficiently through functional transformations, focusing on simplifying asynchronous data processing. Whereas react-three-fiber is optimized for rendering complex 3D scenes with advanced features and interactions, utilizing the GPU for high-performance graphics rendering in web environments.

In Summary, the key differences between Highland.js and react-three-fiber lie in their core functionality, language compatibility, use cases, community support, learning curve, and performance optimization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Highland.js
Highland.js
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber

It manages synchronous and asynchronous code easily, using nothing more than standard JavaScript and Node-like Streams. You may be familiar with Promises, EventEmitters and callbacks, but moving between them is far from seamless.

It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.

Intended to work with node.js(or browserify) environment which is really nice; No alien concepts(from JavaScript/Node perspective); Back-pressure; The implementation is on top of Node streams which is really great idea; Small footprint
React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
147
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
0
Stacks
52
Followers
2
Followers
46
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
WatermelonDB
WatermelonDB
Proppy
Proppy
Cycle.js
Cycle.js
React
React
three.js
three.js

What are some alternatives to Highland.js, react-three-fiber?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

RxJS

RxJS

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase