Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Heroic

5
24
+ 1
0
Pouchdb

147
241
+ 1
6
Add tool

Heroic vs Pouchdb: What are the differences?

Developers describe Heroic as "A scalable time series database based on Cassandra and Elasticsearch, by Spotify". Heroic is Spotify's in-house time series database. It was built to address the challenges Spotify was facing with near real-time data collection and presentation at scale. On the other hand, Pouchdb is detailed as "Open-source JavaScript database inspired by Apache CouchDB that's designed to run well within the browser". PouchDB enables applications to store data locally while offline, then synchronize it with CouchDB and compatible servers when the application is back online, keeping the user's data in sync no matter where they next login.

Heroic and Pouchdb can be primarily classified as "Databases" tools.

Some of the features offered by Heroic are:

  • heroic-core contains the com.spotify.heroic.HeroicCore class which is the central building block for setting up a Heroic instance.
  • heroic-elasticsearch-utils is a collection of utilities for interacting with Elasticsearch. This is separate since we have more than one backend that needs to talk with elasticsearch.
  • heroic-parser provides an Antlr4 implementation of com.spotify.heroic.grammar.QueryParser, which is used to parse the Heroic DSL.

On the other hand, Pouchdb provides the following key features:

  • Cross browser compatibility
  • Lightweight
  • Easy to learn

Heroic and Pouchdb are both open source tools. It seems that Pouchdb with 12.1K GitHub stars and 1.21K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Heroic with 710 GitHub stars and 89 GitHub forks.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Heroic
Pros of Pouchdb
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 2
      Offline cache
    • 1
      JSON
    • 1
      Very fast
    • 1
      Free
    • 1
      Repication

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Heroic?

    Heroic is Spotify's in-house time series database. It was built to address the challenges Spotify was facing with near real-time data collection and presentation at scale.

    What is Pouchdb?

    PouchDB enables applications to store data locally while offline, then synchronize it with CouchDB and compatible servers when the application is back online, keeping the user's data in sync no matter where they next login.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Heroic?
    What companies use Pouchdb?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Heroic?
    What tools integrate with Pouchdb?
    What are some alternatives to Heroic and Pouchdb?
    navi
    It allows you to browse through cheatsheets (that you may write yourself or download from maintainers) and execute commands, prompting for argument values.
    Just
    It is a build task definition library. It stands on the shoulders of two excellent and well tested libraries: undertaker and yargs. It also provides what we call "stacks" to complete the workflow of building a repository.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    See all alternatives