StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Helm Charts
  5. Helm vs Pulumi

Helm vs Pulumi

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Helm
Helm
Stacks1.4K
Followers911
Votes18
Pulumi
Pulumi
Stacks306
Followers293
Votes25
GitHub Stars24.1K
Forks1.3K

Helm vs Pulumi: What are the differences?

Introduction

Both Helm and Pulumi are popular tools used in the world of infrastructure and application deployment. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Package Management: Helm is primarily focused on package management for Kubernetes, providing a way to define, install, and update applications in a Kubernetes cluster. It uses a packaging format called charts, which encapsulate all the necessary resources, dependencies, and configuration for an application. On the other hand, Pulumi offers a more general-purpose infrastructure as code platform, allowing you to define and manage infrastructure resources across different cloud providers using programming languages like JavaScript, Python, and Go.

  2. Imperative vs Declarative: Helm follows an imperative approach, where you define a series of steps and actions to deploy an application. You explicitly specify the desired state of your deployment. Pulumi, on the other hand, takes a declarative approach, where you define the desired end state of your infrastructure using code. Pulumi then determines the necessary actions to bring the actual state of the infrastructure to match the desired state.

  3. Infrastructure Provisioning: Helm is primarily focused on application deployment within a Kubernetes cluster. It assumes that the underlying infrastructure, such as the cluster itself, is already provisioned. Pulumi, on the other hand, can not only deploy applications but also handle infrastructure provisioning. It provides abstractions to create and manage various cloud resources like virtual machines, storage, networks, etc., across different cloud providers.

  4. Language Support: Helm uses its own templating language called Helm Template, which is based on Go templates. These templates allow you to define and manipulate Kubernetes resources. Pulumi, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and Go. This gives you the freedom to choose a language you are more comfortable with and leverage its full power to define and manage your infrastructure.

  5. Extensibility and Community Support: Helm has a large and active community with a vast collection of pre-built charts available in the official Helm chart repository. This makes it easy to reuse and share application templates. Pulumi also has an active community, but being a relatively newer tool, it may have a smaller ecosystem of available resources. However, Pulumi provides the flexibility to use any existing third-party library, npm package, or Python module, making it highly extensible and adaptable.

  6. Managed Service Integration: Helm operates as a standalone tool, independent of any cloud provider. It can be used with any Kubernetes deployment, whether it's on-premises or in the cloud. Pulumi, on the other hand, deeply integrates with various cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It provides enhanced support for managing and provisioning cloud-specific resources and services.

In summary, Helm is primarily focused on package management for Kubernetes applications, using an imperative approach and a packaging format called charts. Pulumi, on the other hand, is a general-purpose infrastructure as code platform with support for multiple programming languages and cloud providers, enabling both infrastructure provisioning and application deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Helm, Pulumi

Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments
Sergey
Sergey

Contractor at Adaptive

Apr 17, 2020

Decided

Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Helm
Helm
Pulumi
Pulumi

Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

-
Containers - Deploy a Docker container to production in 5 minutes using your favorite orchestrator.; Serverless - Stand up a serverless API or event handler in 5 minutes using a real lambda in code.; Infrastructure - Manage cloud infrastructure or hosted services using infrastructure as code.; CoLaDa - Embrace containers, lambdas, and data, using a modern, multi-cloud framework.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
306
Followers
911
Followers
293
Votes
18
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Infrastructure as code
  • 6
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Support
  • 1
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
Pros
  • 8
    Infrastructure as code with less pain
  • 4
    Best-in-class kubernetes support
  • 3
    Can use many languages
  • 3
    Simple
  • 2
    Can be self-hosted
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Helm, Pulumi?

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Azure Resource Manager

Azure Resource Manager

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

Habitat

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

AWS Cloud Development Kit

AWS Cloud Development Kit

It is an open source software development framework to model and provision your cloud application resources using familiar programming languages. It uses the familiarity and expressive power of programming languages for modeling your applications. It provides you with high-level components that preconfigure cloud resources with proven defaults, so you can build cloud applications without needing to be an expert.

Yocto

Yocto

It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

am

am

Official Gravitee.io Helm chart for Access Management.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot