StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. HBase vs InfluxDB vs RocksDB

HBase vs InfluxDB vs RocksDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175
RocksDB
RocksDB
Stacks141
Followers290
Votes11
GitHub Stars30.9K
Forks6.6K

HBase vs InfluxDB vs RocksDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing HBase, InfluxDB, and RocksDB, it is essential to understand the key differences among these databases. Each database has its unique features and use cases, making it crucial to choose the right one based on specific requirements. Below are the key differences between HBase, InfluxDB, and RocksDB.

  1. Data Model: HBase is a column-oriented database that stores data in columns rather than rows, offering fast read and write operations for large datasets. InfluxDB, on the other hand, is specifically designed for time-series data, making it efficient for storing and retrieving time-stamped data points. RocksDB is a key-value store that provides high performance for read-heavy workloads, making it suitable for applications requiring fast access to individual records.

  2. Use Cases: HBase is commonly used in applications that require real-time read and write capabilities, such as social media platforms and e-commerce websites. InfluxDB is ideal for applications that deal with monitoring, IoT sensor data, and DevOps metrics due to its efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data. RocksDB is often used in scenarios that demand low latency and high throughput, like caching layers and logging systems.

  3. Query Language: HBase uses Apache HBase API or Apache Phoenix SQL for querying data, allowing users to perform complex operations on large datasets. InfluxDB uses its query language, InfluxQL, which is specifically optimized for time-series data manipulation, making it easier to work with timestamped datasets. RocksDB does not have a query language built-in and is typically used as an embedded database supporting key-value operations.

  4. Consistency Model: HBase provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always up to date and accurate across multiple nodes in a distributed environment. InfluxDB offers eventual consistency, prioritizing availability and partition tolerance over strict consistency, which may lead to stale data under certain conditions. RocksDB provides strong consistency at the single-node level but may exhibit eventual consistency in distributed configurations.

  5. Scalability: HBase is horizontally scalable, allowing users to add more nodes to the cluster for increased storage capacity and performance. InfluxDB also supports horizontal scalability, enabling users to scale out by adding more nodes as data volume grows. RocksDB is more suited for single-node deployments or limited-scale distributed settings, making it less suitable for massive scalability requirements.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between HBase, InfluxDB, and RocksDB in terms of data model, use cases, query language, consistency model, and scalability can help in making informed decisions when choosing the appropriate database for specific applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on HBase, InfluxDB, RocksDB

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments
pionell
pionell

Sep 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMariaDBMariaDB

I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
RocksDB
RocksDB

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.

-
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Designed for application servers wanting to store up to a few terabytes of data on locally attached Flash drives or in RAM;Optimized for storing small to medium size key-values on fast storage -- flash devices or in-memory;Scales linearly with number of CPUs so that it works well on ARM processors
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.9K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.6K
Stacks
511
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
141
Followers
498
Followers
1.2K
Followers
290
Votes
15
Votes
175
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 5
    Very fast
  • 3
    Made by Facebook
  • 2
    Consistent performance
  • 1
    Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed

What are some alternatives to HBase, InfluxDB, RocksDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase