StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Haxe vs JavaScript

Haxe vs JavaScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JavaScript
JavaScript
Stacks392.3K
Followers284.0K
Votes8.1K
Haxe
Haxe
Stacks151
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.6K
Forks688

Haxe vs JavaScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Haxe and JavaScript are both popular programming languages used for web development. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Compilation: One of the main differences between Haxe and JavaScript is in how they are compiled. Haxe is a compiled language, meaning that the code is first compiled into a target language (such as JavaScript) before it can be run. On the other hand, JavaScript is an interpreted language, which means that it runs directly without any prior compilation step. This compilation process in Haxe allows for greater optimization and performance improvements.

  2. Language Features: Haxe is a statically typed language, while JavaScript is dynamically typed. This means that in Haxe, variable types are checked at compile-time, whereas in JavaScript, they are checked at runtime. This static typing in Haxe helps catch errors early and improves code reliability.

  3. Cross-platform Development: Another significant difference between Haxe and JavaScript is their support for cross-platform development. Haxe is specifically designed for cross-platform development, allowing developers to write code once and target multiple platforms, including JavaScript, Flash, C++, and more. JavaScript, on the other hand, is primarily used for web development and doesn't have the same level of cross-platform support as Haxe.

  4. Standard Library: Haxe has a rich and comprehensive standard library that provides a wide range of built-in classes and functions for various purposes. This extensive standard library makes it easier for developers to perform common tasks without relying heavily on external libraries. In contrast, JavaScript has a smaller standard library and often requires the use of third-party libraries or frameworks to achieve similar functionality.

  5. Type Inference: Haxe has a powerful type inference system, which means that it can often deduce variable types even without explicit type annotations. This feature helps reduce code verbosity and makes the code more concise. JavaScript, on the other hand, lacks strong type inference and generally relies on explicit type annotations.

  6. Tooling and Development Environment: Haxe has a mature and feature-rich toolset, including a robust IDE (Integrated Development Environment) called HaxeDevelop, which provides various features like code completion, debugging, and integrated documentation. JavaScript, on the other hand, has a wide range of development tools and IDEs available, depending on the specific environment or framework being used.

In summary, Haxe and JavaScript differ in their compilation process, language features, cross-platform development support, standard library, type inference capabilities, and tooling/development environment. These differences make Haxe well-suited for cross-platform development and provide developers with additional features and tools that JavaScript may not offer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JavaScript, Haxe

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Muhamed
Muhamed

Apr 28, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptDjangoDjango

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

737k views737k
Comments
William
William

Senior Platform Engineer at ABN AMRO

Jul 17, 2020

Decided

Telegram Messenger has frameworks for most known languages, which makes easier for anyone to integrate with them. I started with Golang and soon found that those frameworks are not up to date, not to mention my experience testing on Golang is also mixed due to how their testing tool works. The natural runner-up was JS, which I'm ditching in favor of TS to make a strongly typed code, proper tests and documentation for broader usage. TypeScript allows fast prototyping and can prevent problems during code phase, given that your IDE of choice has support for a language server, and build phase. Pairing it with lint tools also allows honing code before it even hits the repositories.

409k views409k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JavaScript
JavaScript
Haxe
Haxe

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

It is an open source toolkit based on a modern, high level, strictly typed programming language, a cross-compiler, a complete cross-platform standard library and ways to access each platform's native capabilities.

-
Extension methods; Functional programming; Ability to target alternate platforms such as C#.NET; Ability to target devices that support only C++
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
688
Stacks
392.3K
Stacks
151
Followers
284.0K
Followers
59
Votes
8.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1670
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1497
    It's everywhere
  • 1163
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
Cons
  • 24
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 16
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
Pros
  • 0
    [object Object]
Integrations
No integrations available
C++
C++
HTML5
HTML5
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
C#
C#

What are some alternatives to JavaScript, Haxe?

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase