StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Haskell vs PureScript

Haskell vs PureScript

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Haskell
Haskell
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.2K
Votes527
PureScript
PureScript
Stacks88
Followers86
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks569

Haskell vs PureScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Haskell and PureScript are both functional programming languages that share a lot of similarities but also have some key differences. This article aims to highlight and discuss six important differences between Haskell and PureScript.

  1. Syntax and Type System: While both Haskell and PureScript are statically typed functional languages, PureScript uses a simpler and more JavaScript-like syntax compared to Haskell's more complex and mathematically-oriented syntax. Additionally, PureScript has a more expressive type system that allows for more fine-grained control over types.

  2. JavaScript Interoperability: PureScript was primarily designed for compiling to JavaScript, which makes it easy to interoperate with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks. Haskell, on the other hand, does not have native support for JavaScript interoperability and requires additional tools or libraries to achieve the same level of integration.

  3. Ecosystem and Libraries: Haskell has a more mature and extensive ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available for various purposes. PureScript, being a relatively newer language, has a smaller ecosystem but still provides many useful libraries specifically tailored for web development.

  4. Learning Curve: Haskell, due to its mathematical foundations, has a steeper learning curve for beginners. Understanding and applying advanced concepts like monads, type classes, and higher-order functions can be challenging for newcomers. PureScript, while still requiring a solid understanding of functional programming, has a slightly lower learning curve, making it more accessible for beginners.

  5. Performance: Haskell is known for its optimized performance and efficient runtime system. It has powerful optimizations and strict evaluation strategies that can lead to highly performant code. PureScript, on the other hand, may not have the same level of performance optimization and may sometimes rely on JavaScript runtime for execution, which can introduce some overhead.

  6. Community Support: Haskell has a large and active community with numerous online resources, forums, and meetups available for support and learning. PureScript, being a more niche language, has a smaller but growing community. While PureScript's community support may not be as extensive as Haskell's, it is still evolving and has dedicated contributors.

In summary, Haskell and PureScript differ in their syntax, type systems, JavaScript interoperability, ecosystems, learning curve, performance optimizations, and community support. While Haskell provides a more extensive ecosystem and performs better, PureScript offers a simpler syntax, better JavaScript integration, and a more beginner-friendly learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Haskell
Haskell
PureScript
PureScript

It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Statically typed; Purely functional; Type inference; Concurrent
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
569
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
88
Followers
1.2K
Followers
86
Votes
527
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 90
    Purely-functional programming
  • 66
    Statically typed
  • 59
    Type-safe
  • 39
    Open source
  • 38
    Great community
Cons
  • 9
    Too much distraction in language extensions
  • 8
    Error messages can be very confusing
  • 5
    Libraries have poor documentation
  • 3
    No best practices
  • 3
    No good ABI
Pros
  • 6
    Purely functional
  • 4
    Great FFI to JavaScript
  • 2
    The best type system
  • 2
    Alternate backends
  • 1
    Pursuit
Cons
  • 1
    Not so fancy error reporting
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Have Some Bugs

What are some alternatives to Haskell, PureScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot