Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

HarperDB

5
17
+ 1
9
Memcached

7.6K
5.5K
+ 1
473
Add tool

HarperDB vs Memcached: What are the differences?

Introduction

HarperDB and Memcached are two distinct technologies, each with its own unique set of features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between HarperDB and Memcached can help in making an informed decision on which technology to use for a specific use case.

  1. Data Storage: HarperDB is a fully indexed, SQL-based database that can store and query structured data using traditional SQL queries. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store that is used for caching data to improve performance.

  2. Persistence: HarperDB provides persistent storage by default, ensuring data durability even in the case of unexpected shutdowns or failures. In contrast, Memcached does not inherently provide data persistence and relies on external solutions for data durability.

  3. Data Structure: While HarperDB supports complex data structures, relationships, and indexing, Memcached is best suited for simple key-value pairs and lacks support for complex data structures and relationships.

  4. Query Language: HarperDB supports SQL queries, allowing for complex data retrieval and manipulation through standard SQL syntax. On the other hand, Memcached does not support complex querying capabilities and is primarily used for quickly fetching cached data based on keys.

  5. Scalability: HarperDB offers built-in horizontal scaling capabilities, allowing for seamless distribution of data across multiple nodes for improved performance and availability. Memcached, on the other hand, may require additional configurations and third-party solutions for achieving scalability in distributed environments.

  6. Use Cases: HarperDB is well-suited for applications that require structured data storage, complex querying, and durability guarantees. Memcached, on the other hand, is ideal for applications where fast data access and caching are crucial for improving performance.

In Summary, HarperDB and Memcached differ in their approach to data storage, persistence, data structure, query language, scalability, and use cases.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of HarperDB
Pros of Memcached
  • 2
    Data api
  • 1
    Custom Functions
  • 1
    Edge capabilities
  • 1
    Cost efficient
  • 1
    Integration
  • 1
    Flexibility
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Distribution capabilities
  • 139
    Fast object cache
  • 129
    High-performance
  • 91
    Stable
  • 65
    Mature
  • 33
    Distributed caching system
  • 11
    Improved response time and throughput
  • 3
    Great for caching HTML
  • 2
    Putta

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of HarperDB
Cons of Memcached
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Only caches simple types

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is HarperDB?

    With flexible user-defined APIs, simple HTTP/s interface, and a high-performance single-model data store that accommodates both NoSQL and SQL workloads, HarperDB scales with your application from proof of concept to production.

    What is Memcached?

    Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use HarperDB?
    What companies use Memcached?
    See which teams inside your own company are using HarperDB or Memcached.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with HarperDB?
    What tools integrate with Memcached?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Dec 22 2020 at 9:26PM

    Pinterest

    Amazon EC2C langMemcached+4
    10
    2627
    Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

    AppSignal

    RedisRubyKafka+9
    15
    1644
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    40
    36286
    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    54
    72325
    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+26
    20
    4953
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    21867
    What are some alternatives to HarperDB and Memcached?
    SQLite
    SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
    Hadoop
    The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    See all alternatives