StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Handlebars.js vs Next.js

Handlebars.js vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Handlebars.js vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Handlebars.js and Next.js. Handlebars.js is a popular templating engine that allows for the dynamic generation of HTML markup, while Next.js is a framework for building server-side rendered React applications.

  1. File structure: Handlebars.js does not provide any specific file structure guidelines. Developers have the flexibility to organize their code and templates in a way that suits their needs. On the other hand, Next.js follows a specific file and folder structure convention that helps developers to maintain a clean and organized codebase.

  2. Rendering: Handlebars.js is a purely client-side templating engine, meaning it renders the templates directly in the browser. It requires an additional step of making requests to the server and fetching the data to populate the templates. Next.js, on the other hand, performs server-side rendering by default. It pre-renders the pages on the server and sends the generated HTML to the client, resulting in faster initial page loads and improved SEO.

  3. Data binding: Handlebars.js offers a simpler data-binding mechanism compared to Next.js. It allows developers to bind data to specific elements in the template using the double curly braces syntax ({{}}). Next.js, being a React framework, leverages the power of React's declarative data-binding approach. Developers can define components in JSX and pass data as props to those components, allowing for more granular control over data-binding.

  4. Client-side interactivity: Handlebars.js focuses on templating and does not provide advanced client-side interactivity out of the box. It is primarily used for rendering static content. Next.js, being built on top of React, enables developers to utilize React's extensive ecosystem for building interactive user interfaces. With Next.js, developers can easily add functionality like form handling, event listeners, and state management using React's components and libraries.

  5. Build process: Handlebars.js does not require a build process as it directly renders the templates in the browser. Developers can simply include the Handlebars.js library in their HTML file and start using it. In contrast, Next.js uses a build process to compile and optimize the React components and pages. This allows for code splitting, efficient bundled files, and other optimizations that improve overall app performance.

  6. Server-side APIs: Handlebars.js does not have built-in support for creating server-side APIs. Developers need to rely on other libraries or frameworks to build APIs that can provide data to Handlebars templates. Next.js, on the other hand, comes with built-in API routing functionality. Developers can define server-side API endpoints right alongside their pages, making it easy to fetch data and send it to the client.

In summary, Handlebars.js is a client-side templating engine focused on generating dynamic content, while Next.js is a framework for building server-side rendered React applications with a defined file structure, powerful data binding, advanced client-side interactivity, build optimizations, and built-in server-side API routing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments
Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Next.js
Next.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
308
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
React
React

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase