Hanami vs Swifton: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Hanami and Swifton:

1. **Architecture**: Hanami uses a modular approach with different components like model, view, and controller separated, while Swifton follows the convention-over-configuration principle with a purely MVC architecture.
2. **Supported Language**: Hanami is built with Ruby, allowing developers who are familiar with Ruby to easily work with it, whereas Swifton is built with Swift, making it more suitable for developers who prefer working with Swift.
3. **Database Support**: Hanami supports SQL and NoSQL databases out of the box, providing flexibility to developers, while Swifton focuses mainly on SQL databases, offering limited options for developers who prefer NoSQL databases.
4. **Scalability**: Hanami is known for being highly scalable, making it a preferred choice for large applications, whereas Swifton may face scalability challenges when handling complex and large-scale projects.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Hanami has a smaller but dedicated community with a growing ecosystem of plugins, gems, and resources, while Swifton benefits from the larger Swift community but may have fewer specialized resources and plugins specifically for web development.
6. **Learning Curve**: Hanami has a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture and concepts, which may require more time for developers to become proficient, whereas Swifton's familiarity with MVC architecture and Swift language may offer a quicker learning curve for developers new to the framework.

In Summary, the key differences between Hanami and Swifton lie in their architecture, supported language, database support, scalability, community, ecosystem, and learning curve, making them suitable for different types of projects and developer preferences.