Hanami vs Sinatra: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Hanami and Sinatra

1. Routing and Middleware Hanami is a full-featured web framework that provides a routing system and built-in middleware stack, allowing for flexible and robust routing and request handling. On the other hand, Sinatra is a microframework that only provides basic routing capabilities and does not include a built-in middleware stack, which means developers need to handle middleware integration manually.

2. ORM Integration Hanami comes with built-in integration for Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries such as ActiveRecord, ROM, and Sequel, offering seamless database integration and a higher level of abstraction for database operations. In contrast, Sinatra does not have built-in ORM integration, requiring developers to manually configure and integrate an ORM library for database interactions.

3. Templating Hanami includes its own lightweight templating system called Hanami View, which provides features like layouts, templates, and partials for organizing and rendering dynamic content. On the other hand, Sinatra does not come with a built-in templating system, giving developers the freedom to choose their preferred templating engine, such as ERB or Haml.

4. Component-Based Architecture Hanami follows a component-based architecture, which means applications are organized into reusable components/modules, promoting better code organization, modularity, and maintainability. Sinatra, on the other hand, does not enforce any particular architectural pattern and gives developers the freedom to choose their preferred code organization approach.

5. Testing and Mocking Hanami provides a testing framework called Hanami Test, which includes various utilities for writing unit and integration tests, as well as built-in mocking capabilities for simulating external dependencies. Sinatra, on the other hand, does not include a built-in testing framework or mocking capabilities, requiring developers to choose and integrate their preferred testing and mocking libraries.

6. Middleware Stacks Hanami offers a built-in middleware stack that allows developers to easily add, remove, and configure middleware components for handling various aspects of the application such as session management, logging, and authentication. Sinatra, although it lacks a built-in middleware stack, has a lightweight ecosystem of middleware libraries that can be manually integrated into the application.

In summary, Hanami provides a more comprehensive web framework with features like a robust routing system, built-in middleware stack, ORM integration, a lightweight templating system, component-based architecture, and testing utilities, while Sinatra is a minimalistic microframework that offers basic routing capabilities and flexibility for developers to choose and integrate their preferred components and libraries.