StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Hanami vs Redwood

Hanami vs Redwood

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hanami
Hanami
Stacks42
Followers63
Votes25
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks549
Redwood
Redwood
Stacks28
Followers50
Votes6

Hanami vs Redwood: What are the differences?

Hanami: Web framework for Ruby. Use the 100+ features that we offer to build powerful products without compromising memory. Hanami consumes 60% less memory than other full-featured Ruby frameworks; Redwood: An integrated, full-stack, JavaScript web framework for the JAMstack. It is an opinionated, full-stack, serverless web application framework that will allow you to build and deploy JAMstack applications with ease. Imagine a React frontend, statically delivered by CDN, that talks via GraphQL to your backend running on AWS Lambdas around the world, all deployable with just a git push—that's Redwood.

Hanami and Redwood can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Hanami and Redwood are both open source tools. It seems that Hanami with 5.23K GitHub stars and 477 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Redwood with 2.69K GitHub stars and 75 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hanami
Hanami
Redwood
Redwood

Use the 100+ features that we offer to build powerful products without compromising memory. Hanami consumes 60% less memory than other full-featured Ruby frameworks.

It is an opinionated, full-stack, serverless web application framework that will allow you to build and deploy JAMstack applications with ease. Imagine a React frontend, statically delivered by CDN, that talks via GraphQL to your backend running on AWS Lambdas around the world, all deployable with just a git push—that's Redwood.

-
Opinionated defaults for formatting, file organization, webpack, Babel, and more; Simple but powerful routing (all routes defined in one file) with dynamic (typed) parameters, constraints, and named route functions (to generate correct URLs); Automatic page-based code-splitting; Boilerplate-less GraphQL API construction; Cells: a declarative way to fetch data from the backend API; Generators for pages, layouts, cells, SDL, services, etc; Scaffold generator for CRUD operations around a specific DB table; Forms with easy client- and/or server-side validation and error handling; Hot module replacement (HMR) for faster development; Database migrations (via Prisma 2); First class JAMstack-style deployment to Netlify
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
549
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
42
Stacks
28
Followers
63
Followers
50
Votes
25
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    A light, fast, and very well documented web framework
  • 6
    Amazing ideas
  • 5
    Not Javascript
  • 3
    Ruby
  • 2
    Inspired in the clean architecture
Cons
  • 0
    No job
Pros
  • 2
    Cells
  • 2
    React+Prisma+GraphQL
  • 1
    Storybook integrated development
  • 1
    Easy setup + generators
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
React
React
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Netlify
Netlify
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Hanami, Redwood?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase