Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
HAML vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?
Developers describe HAML as "HTML Abstraction Markup Language - A Markup Haiku". Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content. On the other hand, WebAssembly is detailed as "A binary instruction format for a stack-based virtual machine". It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.
HAML and WebAssembly belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.
HAML and WebAssembly are both open source tools. WebAssembly with 3.49K GitHub stars and 347 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than HAML with 3.44K GitHub stars and 545 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, HAML has a broader approval, being mentioned in 139 company stacks & 264 developers stacks; compared to WebAssembly, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.
Pros of HAML
- Clean and simple68
- No html open/close tags49
- Easier to write than ERB39
- Forces clean and readable code36
- Simpler markup language34
- Open Source24
- HTML Templating16
- You'll love it if you like Haikus1
Pros of WebAssembly
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of HAML
- It's not Pug3
Cons of WebAssembly
- Security issues2