StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs PySpark

Hadoop vs PySpark

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
PySpark
PySpark
Stacks491
Followers295
Votes0

Hadoop vs PySpark: What are the differences?

Introduction

Hadoop and PySpark are two popular frameworks used for big data processing. While both are designed for distributed processing, they have some key differences. This article aims to highlight six significant differences between Hadoop and PySpark.

  1. Programming Language: Hadoop is primarily written in Java and supports other languages like C++, Python, and Ruby through language-specific APIs. On the other hand, PySpark is a Python library that provides a Python interface for Apache Spark, which is written in Scala. PySpark allows developers to write Spark applications using Python, leveraging the simplicity and expressiveness of the Python language.

  2. Data Processing Model: Hadoop uses the MapReduce model for data processing. It processes data in two phases: map and reduce. Map tasks perform filtering and sorting, while reduce tasks aggregate and summarize the map outputs. In contrast, PySpark uses a more flexible and efficient processing model called Resilient Distributed Datasets (RDDs). RDDs are fault-tolerant and distributed collections of objects that can be processed in parallel across multiple nodes.

  3. Ease of Use: Hadoop requires extensive configuration and setup, making it more complex to install and manage. Additionally, Hadoop developers need to write code in Java, which can be harder for those who are not familiar with the language. PySpark, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly API in Python, allowing developers to write concise and readable code. This makes PySpark more accessible to developers with Python expertise.

  4. Performance: Hadoop's MapReduce model is optimized for batch processing of large datasets. It is well-suited for tasks that involve processing large amounts of data sequentially. PySpark, on the other hand, provides in-memory processing capabilities through RDDs. This allows PySpark to perform iterative and interactive data processing tasks much faster than Hadoop. PySpark's performance advantage becomes apparent when dealing with complex data analytics and machine learning workloads.

  5. Ecosystem: Hadoop has a mature and extensive ecosystem with various tools and frameworks built around it. It includes components like HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System), Hive, Pig, and HBase, which provide additional functionalities for data storage, querying, and processing. PySpark, being a part of the Apache Spark ecosystem, benefits from a rich set of libraries and tools for big data analytics, machine learning, and graph processing. This makes PySpark a more versatile and comprehensive solution for big data processing.

  6. Real-time Processing: Hadoop's MapReduce model is not suitable for real-time data processing as it is optimized for batch processing. While there are frameworks like Apache Storm that can provide real-time capabilities on top of Hadoop, it requires additional setup and configuration. PySpark, on the other hand, supports real-time processing through its Spark Streaming module. It allows developers to process and analyze data streams in real-time, enabling applications like real-time monitoring, fraud detection, and sentiment analysis.

In Summary, Hadoop predominantly uses Java and the MapReduce model, while PySpark is a Python library built on top of Spark, offering a more accessible programming language, flexible data processing model, better performance, a comprehensive ecosystem, and real-time processing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
PySpark
PySpark

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It is the collaboration of Apache Spark and Python. it is a Python API for Spark that lets you harness the simplicity of Python and the power of Apache Spark in order to tame Big Data.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
491
Followers
2.3K
Followers
295
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, PySpark?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase