StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Hadoop vs MemSQL

Hadoop vs MemSQL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MemSQL
MemSQL
Stacks86
Followers184
Votes44
Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K

Hadoop vs MemSQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of big data processing and analysis, Hadoop and MemSQL are two popular technologies. While both serve the purpose of handling large volumes of data, they have distinct characteristics that set them apart from each other.

  1. Architecture: Hadoop utilizes a distributed file system (HDFS) and a MapReduce framework for processing data across a cluster of commodity hardware. On the other hand, MemSQL adopts a distributed, in-memory, SQL database architecture that allows for real-time data processing and analytics.

  2. Data Processing Speed: Hadoop processes data in batch mode, which can result in slower processing times for real-time applications. MemSQL, being an in-memory database, offers much faster data processing speeds by storing data in memory rather than on disk.

  3. Query Language Support: Hadoop primarily uses Java-based MapReduce for processing data, which can be complex for non-developers. In contrast, MemSQL supports standard SQL queries, making it easier for analysts and data scientists to work with the data.

  4. Scalability: Hadoop is highly scalable as it can easily add nodes to the existing cluster to accommodate more data processing requirements. While MemSQL also offers scalability, it is limited by the amount of RAM available in the cluster.

  5. Data Storage: Hadoop is optimized for storing and processing unstructured and semi-structured data, making it ideal for big data analytics. In contrast, MemSQL is suited for structured data storage and processing, making it a better choice for transactional applications and real-time analytics.

Summary

In summary, Hadoop is a distributed file system with a batch processing framework, whereas MemSQL is an in-memory, distributed SQL database, offering faster data processing speeds and support for real-time analytics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MemSQL, Hadoop

pionell
pionell

Sep 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMariaDBMariaDB

I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MemSQL
MemSQL
Hadoop
Hadoop

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

ANSI SQL Support;Fully-distributed Joins;Compiled Queries; ACID Compliance;In-Memory Tables;On-Disk Tables; Massively Parallel Execution;Lock Free Data Structures;JSON Support; High Availability; Online Backup and Restore;Online Replication
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
Stacks
86
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
184
Followers
2.3K
Votes
44
Votes
56
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Distributed
  • 5
    Realtime
  • 4
    Concurrent
  • 4
    Columnstore
  • 4
    JSON
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
Integrations
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
MySQL
MySQL
QlikView
QlikView
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to MemSQL, Hadoop?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase