StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. GWT vs jQuery

GWT vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
GWT
GWT
Stacks88
Followers100
Votes0

GWT vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, I will provide the key differences between GWT and jQuery, focusing on six specific points. GWT (Google Web Toolkit) and jQuery are both popular web development frameworks with distinct features and purposes. Understanding their differences can help developers choose the most suitable framework for their projects.

  1. Execution Environment: GWT allows developers to write web applications in Java, which can be translated into JavaScript for execution in the client's browser. On the other hand, jQuery is a JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversal, event handling, and animation for rapid web development.

  2. Language and Syntax: GWT primarily uses Java as its programming language, providing object-oriented features and static typing. In contrast, jQuery is written entirely in JavaScript, utilizing its dynamic nature and extensive built-in functions.

  3. Purpose and Focus: GWT is designed to enable developers to build complex, high-performance web applications with a focus on scalability and maintainability. jQuery, however, is primarily geared towards simplifying and enhancing client-side scripting, making it easier to manipulate HTML, handle events, and create interactive user experiences.

  4. Abstraction Level: GWT operates at a higher abstraction level by allowing developers to write code in Java and abstracting away the complexities of JavaScript implementation details. jQuery, being a JavaScript library, provides a lower-level abstraction and requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript to fully leverage its capabilities.

  5. Cross-Browser Compatibility: GWT automatically handles many browser compatibility issues by generating optimized JavaScript code specific to each browser. jQuery also helps address cross-browser compatibility concerns, but it requires developers to write code that adheres to the standards and best practices supported by different browsers.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: GWT has a well-established community and a range of available plugins, libraries, and frameworks that support its development ecosystem. jQuery, with its large user base, offers an extensive collection of plugins and resources that can enhance the development process.

In summary, GWT is a Java-based framework that emphasizes scalability and maintainability, while jQuery is a JavaScript library focused on simplifying client-side scripting and enhancing user experiences. GWT operates at a higher level of abstraction and automatically handles cross-browser compatibility, while jQuery requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript and offers a larger community and range of resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on jQuery, GWT

Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments
kazi
kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k
Comments
Manatsawin
Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
GWT
GWT

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
88
Followers
70.6K
Followers
100
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to jQuery, GWT?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase