Jackson vs guava

Overview

Jackson

Stacks452

Followers74

Votes0

GitHub Stars9.6K

Forks1.2K

guava

Stacks2.2K

Followers193

Votes6

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks11.1K

Jackson vs guava: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Jackson and Guava

Jackson and Guava are two popular Java libraries that serve different purposes. While Jackson is primarily used for JSON processing, Guava offers a collection of core libraries and utilities for Java development. Below are the key differences between Jackson and Guava:

1. **Functionality**: 
Jackson is focused on JSON parsing, generation, and data binding, providing powerful tools for working with JSON data. On the other hand, Guava offers a wide range of utilities for common programming tasks such as collections, caching, functional programming, and more.

2. **Purpose**:
Jackson is mainly used for serialization and deserialization of JSON data in Java applications, making it an essential tool for working with web services, APIs, and data interchange formats. Guava, on the other hand, provides additional functionalities that help in everyday Java programming tasks, such as immutable collections, caching, and concurrency support.

3. **Community and Support**:
Jackson has a large and active user community with regular updates and improvements, making it a preferred choice for many developers working with JSON data. Guava is maintained by Google and has a solid reputation for reliability and performance, with regular updates and contributions from the open-source community.

4. **Integration**:
Jackson seamlessly integrates with popular frameworks like Spring, Hibernate, and JAX-RS, providing a robust ecosystem for working with JSON data in Java applications. Guava, on the other hand, is more focused on providing core Java utilities and does not have as many integrations with third-party libraries and frameworks.

5. **Performance**:
Jackson is known for its high performance and efficiency in JSON processing, making it a top choice for projects that require quick and reliable JSON serialization and deserialization. Guava, while efficient in its own right, may not offer the same level of performance specifically for JSON-related tasks.

6. **Dependencies**:
Jackson has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into Java projects without adding too much overhead. Guava, on the other hand, may require additional dependencies beyond the core library, depending on the specific functionalities needed for a given project.

In Summary, Jackson is mainly focused on JSON parsing and data binding, while Guava offers a broader set of core Java utilities and libraries for everyday programming tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jackson	guava
It is a suite of data-processing tools for Java (and the JVM platform), including the flagship streaming JSON parser / generator library, matching data-binding library (POJOs to and from JSON) and additional data format modules to process data encoded in Avro, BSON, CBOR, CSV, Smile, (Java) Properties, Protobuf, XML or YAML; and even the large set of data format modules to support data types of widely used data types such as Guava, Joda.	The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.6K	GitHub Stars 51.2K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 11.1K
Stacks 452	Stacks 2.2K
Followers 74	Followers 193
Votes 0	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 Interface Driven API 1 Easy to setup

What are some alternatives to Jackson, guava?

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

RxJava

A library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences for the Java VM.

MapStruct

It is a code generator that greatly simplifies the implementation of mappings between Java bean types based on a convention over configuration approach. The generated mapping code uses plain method invocations and thus is fast, type-safe and easy to understand.

Java 8

It is a revolutionary release of the world’s no 1 development platform. It includes a huge upgrade to the Java programming model and a coordinated evolution of the JVM, Java language, and libraries. Java 8 includes features for productivity, ease of use, improved polyglot programming, security and improved performance.

Apache FreeMarker

It is a "template engine"; a generic tool to generate text output (anything from HTML to auto generated source code) based on templates. It's a Java package, a class library for Java programmers.

Project Reactor

It is a fourth-generation Reactive library for building non-blocking applications on the JVM based on the Reactive Streams Specification. It is a fully non-blocking foundation with efficient demand management. It directly interacts with Java functional API, Completable Future, Stream and Duration.

Related Comparisons

Jackson vs guava: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Jackson and Guava

Jackson and Guava are two popular Java libraries that serve different purposes. While Jackson is primarily used for JSON processing, Guava offers a collection of core libraries and utilities for Java development. Below are the key differences between Jackson and Guava:

1. **Functionality**: 
Jackson is focused on JSON parsing, generation, and data binding, providing powerful tools for working with JSON data. On the other hand, Guava offers a wide range of utilities for common programming tasks such as collections, caching, functional programming, and more.

2. **Purpose**:
Jackson is mainly used for serialization and deserialization of JSON data in Java applications, making it an essential tool for working with web services, APIs, and data interchange formats. Guava, on the other hand, provides additional functionalities that help in everyday Java programming tasks, such as immutable collections, caching, and concurrency support.

3. **Community and Support**:
Jackson has a large and active user community with regular updates and improvements, making it a preferred choice for many developers working with JSON data. Guava is maintained by Google and has a solid reputation for reliability and performance, with regular updates and contributions from the open-source community.

4. **Integration**:
Jackson seamlessly integrates with popular frameworks like Spring, Hibernate, and JAX-RS, providing a robust ecosystem for working with JSON data in Java applications. Guava, on the other hand, is more focused on providing core Java utilities and does not have as many integrations with third-party libraries and frameworks.

5. **Performance**:
Jackson is known for its high performance and efficiency in JSON processing, making it a top choice for projects that require quick and reliable JSON serialization and deserialization. Guava, while efficient in its own right, may not offer the same level of performance specifically for JSON-related tasks.

6. **Dependencies**:
Jackson has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into Java projects without adding too much overhead. Guava, on the other hand, may require additional dependencies beyond the core library, depending on the specific functionalities needed for a given project.

In Summary, Jackson is mainly focused on JSON parsing and data binding, while Guava offers a broader set of core Java utilities and libraries for everyday programming tasks.

Jackson vs guava

Overview