StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. Netty vs gRPC

Netty vs gRPC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netty
Netty
Stacks264
Followers408
Votes17
GitHub Stars34.6K
Forks16.2K
gRPC
gRPC
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.4K
Votes64
GitHub Stars43.9K
Forks11.0K

Netty vs gRPC: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Netty and gRPC, two popular frameworks used in building network applications.

  1. Protocols and Communication Patterns: Netty is a flexible and general-purpose networking framework that supports various protocols and communication patterns, such as TCP, UDP, HTTP, and WebSocket. It provides low-level network programming capabilities and allows developers to customize their application's networking behavior. On the other hand, gRPC is a high-performance, open-source framework specifically designed for remote procedure call (RPC) communication. It uses the HTTP/2 protocol as the underlying transport and supports bi-directional streaming, making it ideal for building microservices and distributed systems.

  2. Serialization and Data Formats: Netty offers flexibility in terms of serialization and data formats. It allows developers to use any serialization library of their choice, such as protobuf, JSON, XML, or custom formats. Developers can implement the desired serialization logic based on their application requirements. In contrast, gRPC uses Protocol Buffers (protobuf) as its default serialization format. Protobuf provides a compact binary format with efficient encoding and decoding, making it suitable for high-performance communication between distributed systems.

  3. Code Generation and APIs: Netty provides a low-level, event-driven programming model that allows developers to build network applications by handling various events, such as connection establishment, data reception, and sending data. It offers a rich set of APIs for network programming and requires developers to write custom code for handling protocol-specific logic. On the other hand, gRPC follows a high-level, contract-driven approach. It uses Protocol Buffers IDL (Interface Definition Language) to define the service contract and automatically generates server and client stub code based on the contract. This reduces the amount of boilerplate code developers need to write and simplifies the development process.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Netty is known for its high-performance and scalability. It provides an asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model that enables the handling of thousands of concurrent connections with low overhead. Netty's event-driven architecture allows for efficient resource utilization and high throughput. gRPC also offers excellent performance and scalability. It uses HTTP/2's multiplexing and streaming capabilities, which enable the processing of multiple RPC calls concurrently over a single connection. This reduces the number of network round-trips and improves overall application performance.

  5. Platform Support: Netty is a Java-based framework and runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It also provides support for other programming languages, such as C, C++, Python, and JavaScript, through language-specific bindings. gRPC, on the other hand, provides support for a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C++, Go, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, and more. This makes gRPC a more versatile choice for building applications in different programming languages.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Netty has a mature and active community with a wide range of resources, including documentation, tutorials, user forums, and third-party libraries. It has been widely adopted in various domains, such as web servers, proxies, chat applications, and more. gRPC, being a relatively newer framework, is gaining popularity rapidly. It has a growing community and ecosystem, with support from major tech companies like Google. It also provides additional features like load balancing, authentication, and distributed tracing through integrations with tools like Kubernetes, Istio, and OpenTelemetry.

In summary, Netty and gRPC differ in terms of supported protocols, serialization formats, programming models, performance characteristics, platform support, and community ecosystems. Netty offers a flexible and customizable networking framework, while gRPC provides a high-level RPC communication framework with automatic code generation capabilities. Depending on the requirements of your application, you can choose between the two frameworks to build efficient and scalable network applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netty
Netty
gRPC
gRPC

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...

-
Simple service definition;Works across languages and platforms;Start quickly and scale;Works across languages and platforms;Bi-directional streaming and integrated auth
Statistics
GitHub Stars
34.6K
GitHub Stars
43.9K
GitHub Forks
16.2K
GitHub Forks
11.0K
Stacks
264
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
408
Followers
1.4K
Votes
17
Votes
64
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    High Performance
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Just like it
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    Limited resources to learn from
Pros
  • 25
    Higth performance
  • 15
    The future of API
  • 13
    Easy setup
  • 5
    Contract-based
  • 4
    Polyglot
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
Swift
Swift
Java
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript
C++
C++
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Netty, gRPC?

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

RxJS

RxJS

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Finagle

Finagle

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

REST

REST

An architectural style for developing web services. A distributed system framework that uses Web protocols and technologies.

Tokio

Tokio

It is an open source library providing an asynchronous, event driven platform for building fast, reliable, and lightweight network applications. It leverages Rust's ownership and concurrency model to ensure thread safety.

Redux Observable

Redux Observable

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Apache Dubbo

Apache Dubbo

It is a high-performance, light weight, java based RPC framework. Dubbo offers three key functionalities, which include interface based remote call, fault tolerance & load balancing, and automatic service registration & discovery.

JSON-RPC

JSON-RPC

It is a very simple protocol, defining only a few data types and commands. It allows for notifications (data sent to the server that does not require a response) and for multiple calls to be sent to the server which may be answered out of order.

ZIO

ZIO

It is a type-safe composable asynchronous and concurrent programming library for Scala that is based on pure functional programming.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase