StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. GreenSock vs Lottie

GreenSock vs Lottie

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GreenSock
GreenSock
Stacks82
Followers117
Votes0
Lottie
Lottie
Stacks454
Followers338
Votes6
GitHub Stars35.5K
Forks5.4K

GreenSock vs Lottie: What are the differences?

GreenSock vs Lottie

GreenSock and Lottie are two popular animation libraries used in web and mobile development. While both libraries serve the purpose of creating animations, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Integration with Design Software: GreenSock provides a plugin called GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) which seamlessly integrates with popular design software like Adobe Illustrator and Adobe After Effects. This allows designers to directly export their animations and easily bring them to life on the web. In contrast, Lottie is specifically designed for After Effects and uses JSON files exported from the software.

  2. Browser Compatibility: GreenSock has been around for several years and has extensive browser support, making it compatible with older browsers as well. It is known for its optimal performance and smooth animations across different platforms. On the other hand, Lottie, being a relatively newer library, is primarily focused on modern browsers and platforms like iOS and Android.

  3. Complexity and Flexibility: GreenSock provides a wide range of tools and features, making it a comprehensive animation library. It offers fine-grained control over animations, allowing developers to create complex and intricate sequences. Lottie, on the other hand, is more focused on bringing animations created in After Effects to the web. It simplifies the process by providing pre-designed animations and allows for easy customization.

  4. File Size: GreenSock animations are typically smaller in file size compared to Lottie animations. This is because GreenSock relies on the code to create animations, while Lottie uses vector-based animations stored in JSON files. While file size may not be a major concern for smaller animations, it becomes significant when dealing with larger or more complex animations.

  5. Community and Support: GreenSock has been widely adopted by the web development community and has a large and active user base. This means there are numerous tutorials, examples, and resources available for learning and troubleshooting. Lottie, being a newer library, has a smaller community but is gaining popularity due to its ease of use.

  6. Platform Compatibility: While GreenSock can be used for web development as well as mobile app development, Lottie is primarily focused on mobile platforms. Lottie provides native libraries for iOS and Android, allowing animations to be directly integrated into mobile apps, making it a preferred choice for mobile developers.

In Summary, GreenSock and Lottie differ in terms of design software integration, browser compatibility, complexity and flexibility, file size, community support, and platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GreenSock
GreenSock
Lottie
Lottie

It is a JavaScript library for creating high-performance animations that work in every major browser. It delivers advanced sequencing, reliability, API efficiency, and tight control while solving real-world problems. It works around countless browser inconsistencies.

Lottie is a mobile library for Android and iOS that parses Adobe After Effects animations exported as json with Bodymovin and renders them natively on mobile!

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
35.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.4K
Stacks
82
Stacks
454
Followers
117
Followers
338
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Is free
  • 2
    Multi platform
  • 1
    Open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Android SDK
Android SDK
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to GreenSock, Lottie?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase