GraPHP vs Meteor

Overview

Meteor

Stacks1.9K

Followers1.8K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars44.8K

Forks5.3K

GraPHP

Stacks0

Followers6

Votes0

GraPHP vs Meteor: What are the differences?

GraPHP: *A PHP graph DB web framework *. The goal of this project is to build a lightweight web framework with a graph DB abstraction. It should be very easy to create the graph schema with no knowledge of of how the data is stored. Also, the schema should be incredibly flexible so you should never need migrations when adding new models (nodes), connections (edges), or data that lives in nodes; Meteor: An ultra-simple, database-everywhere, data-on-the-wire, pure-Javascript web framework. A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

GraPHP and Meteor belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by GraPHP are:

Full MVC. Zero boilerplate controllers, models, and views.
Models are your schema. Defining data is up to you (but not required).
No migrations. Team members can add new models independently without conflicts

On the other hand, Meteor provides the following key features:

Pure JavaScript
Live page updates
Clean, powerful data synchronization

GraPHP and Meteor are both open source tools. It seems that Meteor with 41.2K GitHub stars and 5.03K forks on GitHub has more adoption than GraPHP with 135 GitHub stars and 5 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Meteor, GraPHP

Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor	GraPHP
A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.	The goal of this project is to build a lightweight web framework with a graph DB abstraction. It should be very easy to create the graph schema with no knowledge of of how the data is stored. Also, the schema should be incredibly flexible so you should never need migrations when adding new models (nodes), connections (edges), or data that lives in nodes.
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages	Full MVC. Zero boilerplate controllers, models, and views.;Models are your schema. Defining data is up to you (but not required).;No migrations. Team members can add new models independently without conflicts;No DB queries, unless you want to. Transparent model makes it easy to see what happens under the hood.;DB API is designed for fast performance. No implicit joins or other magic, but expressive enough for nice readable code.;No CLI needed (but supported for cron and tests).;All classes are loaded on demand when used for the first time.;PHP 5.5+
Statistics
GitHub Stars 44.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 0
Followers 1.8K	Followers 6
Votes 1.7K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 251 Real-time 200 Full stack, one language 183 Best app dev platform available today 155 Data synchronization 152 Javascript Cons 5 Does not scale well 4 Hard to debug issues on the server-side 4 Heavily CPU bound	No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS React MongoDB Node.js Apache Cordova	PHP

What are some alternatives to Meteor, GraPHP?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by GraPHP are:

Full MVC. Zero boilerplate controllers, models, and views.
Models are your schema. Defining data is up to you (but not required).
No migrations. Team members can add new models independently without conflicts

On the other hand, Meteor provides the following key features:

Pure JavaScript
Live page updates
Clean, powerful data synchronization

GraPHP vs Meteor