StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Secrets Management
  4. Secrets Management
  5. Vault vs gopass

Vault vs gopass

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vault
Vault
Stacks816
Followers802
Votes71
GitHub Stars33.4K
Forks4.5K
gopass
gopass
Stacks13
Followers24
Votes5

Vault vs gopass: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Vault and gopass are both password management tools that provide a secure and efficient way to store and manage passwords. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Vault is a tool developed by HashiCorp that focuses on secret management and encryption as a service. It provides a centralized solution for storing secrets, authentication, and authorization. On the other hand, gopass is a command-line password manager primarily designed for individual use and does not offer centralized storage or advanced access control features.

  2. Access Control and Collaboration: Vault excels in access control and collaboration capabilities. It allows fine-grained access policies to be defined for users and applications, ensuring that only authorized parties can access certain secrets. It also provides audit logs and supports integration with various authentication backends. Gopass, being more focused on individual use, lacks such sophisticated access control and collaboration features. It mainly offers password storage and retrieval for personal use.

  3. Secret Types and Management: Vault provides a wider range of secret types and secrets management capabilities. It can store not only passwords but also API keys, encryption keys, and certificates. Vault also offers dynamic secrets, which are short-lived credentials generated on-the-fly for applications to access systems or resources securely. Gopass, on the other hand, is primarily designed for password management and does not support managing other types of secrets or providing dynamic secret generation.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Vault is highly extensible and supports seamless integration with various external systems and cloud platforms. It has a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations that allow users to connect Vault with other tools and services. Gopass, on the other hand, has limited integration options and is primarily meant to be used as a standalone command-line tool.

  5. API and Automation: Vault provides a comprehensive API, allowing developers to automate secret management tasks and integrate Vault into their workflows. It offers a wide range of API endpoints for performing operations such as creating, accessing, and revoking secrets. On the other hand, gopass does not provide a dedicated API and is primarily meant for manual interaction through the command-line interface.

  6. Scalability and High Availability: Vault is designed to be highly scalable and supports clustering for high availability. It can be deployed in a distributed environment, allowing multiple instances of Vault to work together and provide redundancy. Gopass, on the other hand, is not designed for scalability or high availability. It is more suitable for individual or small-scale password management needs.

In Summary, Vault and gopass differ in their architecture, access control capabilities, secret types, integration options, automation support, and scalability. Vault is a centralized secret management tool with advanced features, while gopass is a command-line password manager primarily meant for individual use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vault
Vault
gopass
gopass

Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log.

The slightly more awesome Standard Unix Password Manager for Teams. Written in Go. One explicit goal for this project is to make it more approachable to semi- and non-technical users in the long term as well. We go by the UNIX philosophy and try to do one thing and do it well - always providing stellar user experience and sane, simple interfaces.

Secure Secret Storage: Arbitrary key/value secrets can be stored in Vault. Vault encrypts these secrets prior to writing them to persistent storage, so gaining access to the raw storage isn't enough to access your secrets. Vault can write to disk, Consul, and more.;Dynamic Secrets: Vault can generate secrets on-demand for some systems, such as AWS or SQL databases. For example, when an application needs to access an S3 bucket, it asks Vault for credentials, and Vault will generate an AWS keypair with valid permissions on demand. After creating these dynamic secrets, Vault will also automatically revoke them after the lease is up.;Data Encryption: Vault can encrypt and decrypt data without storing it. This allows security teams to define encryption parameters and developers to store encrypted data in a location such as SQL without having to design their own encryption methods.;Leasing and Renewal: All secrets in Vault have a lease associated with it. At the end of the lease, Vault will automatically revoke that secret. Clients are able to renew leases via built-in renew APIs.;Revocation: Vault has built-in support for secret revocation. Vault can revoke not only single secrets, but a tree of secrets, for example all secrets read by a specific user, or all secrets of a particular type. Revocation assists in key rolling as well as locking down systems in the case of an intrusion.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
816
Stacks
13
Followers
802
Followers
24
Votes
71
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Secure
  • 13
    Variety of Secret Backends
  • 11
    Very easy to set up and use
  • 8
    Dynamic secret generation
  • 5
    AuditLog
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easily extended
  • 1
    Self-hosted
  • 1
    UNIX philosophy
Cons
  • 1
    No UI

What are some alternatives to Vault, gopass?

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

1Password

1Password

Lock credentials and secrets in vaults that sync across systems and seamlessly access within your dev, CI/CD, and production environments. Plus, generate and use SSH keys directly from 1Password, automate infrastructure secrets, and more.

Dashlane

Dashlane

Dashlane is a password manager and online security app for everyone who lives, works, and plays on the internet.

Doppler

Doppler

Doppler’s developer-first security platform empowers teams to seamlessly manage, orchestrate, and govern secrets at scale.

IBM SKLM

IBM SKLM

It centralizes, simplifies and automates the encryption key management process to help minimize risk and reduce operational costs of encryption key management. It offers secure, robust key storage, key serving and key lifecycle management for IBM and non-IBM storage solutions using the OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP).

Docker Secrets

Docker Secrets

A container native solution that strengthens the Trusted Delivery component of container security by integrating secret distribution directly into the container platform.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana