StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Tools
  5. Google Maps vs Solr

Google Maps vs Solr

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Solr
Solr
Stacks805
Followers644
Votes126
Google Maps
Google Maps
Stacks42.5K
Followers29.8K
Votes568

Google Maps vs Solr: What are the differences?

1. Data Types Supported: Google Maps provides geographical information and mapping data, while Solr is a search platform that supports indexing and searching structured content. Google Maps focuses on mapping data like locations, directions, and places, whereas Solr is designed for text-based search queries on various types of documents and data.

2. User Interface and Interaction: Google Maps offers an interactive map interface with features like street view, satellite imagery, and real-time traffic updates. On the other hand, Solr does not provide a visual interface but offers a robust search API that can be integrated into custom applications for text-based search functionality.

3. Query Handling and Processing: In Google Maps, users typically enter search queries related to geographical locations, addresses, or points of interest. In Solr, users can perform complex search queries using various parameters, filters, and operators to retrieve specific data or documents based on search criteria.

4. Scalability and Customization: Google Maps is a managed service provided by Google, offering scalability and a set of predefined features for mapping tasks. Solr, being an open-source search platform, allows for extensive customization and scalability options to tailor the search experience according to specific requirements and business needs.

5. Pricing and Licensing: Google Maps has pricing tiers based on usage and access to premium features, while Solr is freely available under the Apache License with no licensing costs. Organizations may need to consider the budget implications and licensing restrictions when choosing between Google Maps and Solr for their mapping or search requirements.

6. Integration and Ecosystem: Google Maps has extensive integration options with other Google services like Places API, Directions API, and Street View API. Solr, being a part of the Apache Lucene project, has a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations with various programming languages and frameworks for seamless integration into different applications and systems.

In Summary, Google Maps and Solr differ in terms of their focus on geographical mapping data versus text-based search, user interface capabilities, query handling, scalability, pricing, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Solr, Google Maps

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 4, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."

183k views183k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Solr
Solr
Google Maps
Google Maps

Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

Advanced full-text search capabilities; Optimized for high volume web traffic; Standards-based open interfaces - XML, JSON and HTTP; Comprehensive HTML administration interfaces; Server statistics exposed over JMX for monitoring; Linearly scalable, auto index replication, auto-failover and recovery; Near real-time indexing; Flexible and adaptable with XML configuration; Extensible plugin architecture
Maps Image APIs;Places API;Web Services;Google Earth API;Maps API Licensing;Google Maps API for Work
Statistics
Stacks
805
Stacks
42.5K
Followers
644
Followers
29.8K
Votes
126
Votes
568
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Powerful
  • 22
    Indexing and searching
  • 20
    Scalable
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 13
    Enterprise Ready
Pros
  • 253
    Free
  • 136
    Address input through maps api
  • 82
    Sharable Directions
  • 47
    Google Earth
  • 46
    Unique
Cons
  • 5
    Google Attributions and logo
  • 2
    Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete
Integrations
Lucene
Lucene
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Solr, Google Maps?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Mapbox

Mapbox

We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.

Leaflet

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

OpenLayers

OpenLayers

An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.

ArcGIS

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

Dejavu

Dejavu

dejaVu fits the unmet need of being a hackable data browser for Elasticsearch. Existing browsers were either built with a legacy UI and had a lacking user experience or used server side rendering (I am looking at you, Kibana).

CSV2GEO

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MapTiler

MapTiler

It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope