Google Fonts vs Unicons

Overview

Google Fonts

Stacks78.1K

Followers14.0K

Votes13

Unicons

Stacks1

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.5K

Forks105

Google Fonts vs Unicons: What are the differences?

Variety of Resources: Google Fonts primarily focuses on providing a diverse selection of fonts for use in web design projects, offering hundreds of font families in different styles and languages. On the other hand, Unicons specializes in offering a comprehensive library of icons and vector illustrations, making it a valuable resource for incorporating visual elements into web pages.
Licensing: Google Fonts are available for free and can be easily integrated into websites without any licensing fees. Unicons, on the other hand, offers both free and premium icons, with the premium option granting users access to additional features and resources. This distinction in licensing models can impact the cost and flexibility of using these resources in web projects.
Customization Options: Google Fonts allow users to adjust font weights, styles, and sizes to customize the appearance of text on web pages. In contrast, Unicons provide a range of customization options for icons, such as color changes, size adjustments, and animation effects, allowing for greater flexibility in designing visual elements.
Usage Flexibility: While Google Fonts are primarily intended for enhancing the typography of websites, Unicons can be used for a variety of purposes beyond web design, including UI/UX design, mobile applications, and graphic design projects. This versatility in application makes Unicons a valuable resource for different types of design work.
Community Support: Google Fonts have a well-established community of users and developers who contribute to the platform by creating and sharing font collections. In comparison, Unicons also benefits from a growing community of designers who contribute to the library by adding new icons and resources, fostering a collaborative environment for expanding the collection.
Integration Ease: Google Fonts can be easily integrated into websites using simple HTML or CSS code snippets, making it accessible for designers with varying levels of technical expertise. Similarly, Unicons provide straightforward integration options, with libraries and plugins available for popular web development frameworks, facilitating the seamless incorporation of icons into web projects.

In Summary, Google Fonts focus on font variety and ease of use, while Unicons specialize in customizable icons for diverse design applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Fonts	Unicons
A library of 915 free licensed fonts, an interactive web directory for browsing the library, and APIs for conveniently using the fonts via CSS and Android.	It is a library of 1000+ FREE vector icons and icon-font in Line style. Icons are available in SVG files to download or can be used as web-font.
Test out custom text; Compare fonts for the perfect pairing	2200+ Icons; Multiple Styles; 27 Categories; Web Fonts and SVG Icons
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 105
Stacks 78.1K	Stacks 1
Followers 14.0K	Followers 15
Votes 13	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Restrict character set 5 Free	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Vue.js React Adobe XD Adobe Photoshop Sketch Adobe Illustrator

What are some alternatives to Google Fonts, Unicons?

Font Awesome

You can get vector icons and social logos on your website with it. It is a font that's made up of symbols, icons, or pictograms that you can use in a webpage, just like a font.

Remix Icon

A set of open source neutral-style system symbols for designers and developers. Licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.

LineIcons

It is an icon pack of 2000+ line icons for designers and developers. Packed with all essential icons from 20+ different categories, 2 weight variations, scalable file formats (SVG, WebFont, Ai, React, etc.) high legibility, free CDN, and much more.

Typekit

It is an online service which offers a subscription library of high-quality fonts. The fonts may be used directly on websites or synced via Adobe Creative Cloud to applications on the subscriber's computers.

Typography

It is the art and technique of arranging type to make written language legible, readable, and appealing when displayed. This term is also applied to the style, arrangement, and appearance of the letters, numbers, and symbols created by the process.

Heroicons

It is a set of 450+ free MIT-licensed high-quality SVG icons for you to use in your web projects. Available as basic SVG icons and via first-party React and Vue libraries.

FreeType

It is a free, high-quality and portable Font engine. It is designed to be small, efficient, highly customizable, and portable while capable of producing high-quality output (glyph images) of most vector and bitmap font formats.

JetBrains Mono

It is the free and open-source typeface for developers that makes it easier to read code.

CoreUI Icons

It is an open-source icon set with more than 500 icons in multiple formats SVG, PNG, and Webfonts. They are beautifully crafted symbols for common actions and items. You can use them in your digital products for web or mobile app.

Colors & Fonts

It is a curated library of colors, fonts, and resources for web developers & digital designers.

Related Comparisons

Google Fonts vs Unicons: What are the differences?

Variety of Resources: Google Fonts primarily focuses on providing a diverse selection of fonts for use in web design projects, offering hundreds of font families in different styles and languages. On the other hand, Unicons specializes in offering a comprehensive library of icons and vector illustrations, making it a valuable resource for incorporating visual elements into web pages.
Licensing: Google Fonts are available for free and can be easily integrated into websites without any licensing fees. Unicons, on the other hand, offers both free and premium icons, with the premium option granting users access to additional features and resources. This distinction in licensing models can impact the cost and flexibility of using these resources in web projects.
Customization Options: Google Fonts allow users to adjust font weights, styles, and sizes to customize the appearance of text on web pages. In contrast, Unicons provide a range of customization options for icons, such as color changes, size adjustments, and animation effects, allowing for greater flexibility in designing visual elements.
Usage Flexibility: While Google Fonts are primarily intended for enhancing the typography of websites, Unicons can be used for a variety of purposes beyond web design, including UI/UX design, mobile applications, and graphic design projects. This versatility in application makes Unicons a valuable resource for different types of design work.
Community Support: Google Fonts have a well-established community of users and developers who contribute to the platform by creating and sharing font collections. In comparison, Unicons also benefits from a growing community of designers who contribute to the library by adding new icons and resources, fostering a collaborative environment for expanding the collection.
Integration Ease: Google Fonts can be easily integrated into websites using simple HTML or CSS code snippets, making it accessible for designers with varying levels of technical expertise. Similarly, Unicons provide straightforward integration options, with libraries and plugins available for popular web development frameworks, facilitating the seamless incorporation of icons into web projects.

In Summary, Google Fonts focus on font variety and ease of use, while Unicons specialize in customizable icons for diverse design applications.

Google Fonts vs Unicons

Overview