Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?
**Introduction**
Google Cloud Storage and Rook are two popular storage solutions in the cloud computing realm. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is essential for businesses looking to make informed decisions on their storage needs.
**1. Scalability**: Google Cloud Storage offers virtually unlimited scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve large amounts of data with ease. On the other hand, Rook provides scalability by leveraging underlying storage solutions like Ceph and CockroachDB, which may limit the scalability depending on the capabilities of these underlying systems.
**2. Cost**: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and bandwidth they use. Rook, on the other hand, is an open-source project with no direct cost associated with using the software, but users need to consider the costs of managing and maintaining the underlying storage systems.
**3. Managed Service vs. Self-Managed**: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed service, where Google handles all aspects of the storage infrastructure, including maintenance and updates. Rook, on the other hand, requires users to manage and configure the underlying storage systems themselves, providing more flexibility but requiring additional resources and expertise.
**4. Integration**: Google Cloud Storage seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, making it an ideal choice for organizations already using Google Cloud Platform. Rook, on the other hand, can be integrated with various cloud and on-premises storage solutions, offering more flexibility in storage environments.
**5. High Availability**: Google Cloud Storage guarantees high availability and durability of data through replication and redundancy mechanisms built into the service. Rook relies on the underlying storage systems for high availability, which may vary depending on the configuration and setup of these systems.
**6. Data Security**: Google Cloud Storage provides advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access controls, and audit logs to protect data. Rook relies on the security measures of the underlying storage systems, requiring users to ensure proper security configurations and practices.
In Summary, Google Cloud Storage and Rook differ in scalability, cost, managed service options, integration capabilities, high availability mechanisms, and data security measures.
We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.
We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.
Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Google Cloud Storage
- Scalable28
- Cheap19
- Reliable14
- Easy9
- Chealp3
- More praticlal and easy2
Pros of Rook
- Minio Integration3
- Open Source1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Cloud Storage
Cons of Rook
- Ceph is difficult2
- Slow1