Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Storage

1.7K
1.2K
+ 1
75
Rook

53
103
+ 1
4
Add tool

Google Cloud Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?

**Introduction**
Google Cloud Storage and Rook are two popular storage solutions in the cloud computing realm. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is essential for businesses looking to make informed decisions on their storage needs.

**1. Scalability**: Google Cloud Storage offers virtually unlimited scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve large amounts of data with ease. On the other hand, Rook provides scalability by leveraging underlying storage solutions like Ceph and CockroachDB, which may limit the scalability depending on the capabilities of these underlying systems.

**2. Cost**: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and bandwidth they use. Rook, on the other hand, is an open-source project with no direct cost associated with using the software, but users need to consider the costs of managing and maintaining the underlying storage systems.

**3. Managed Service vs. Self-Managed**: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed service, where Google handles all aspects of the storage infrastructure, including maintenance and updates. Rook, on the other hand, requires users to manage and configure the underlying storage systems themselves, providing more flexibility but requiring additional resources and expertise.

**4. Integration**: Google Cloud Storage seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, making it an ideal choice for organizations already using Google Cloud Platform. Rook, on the other hand, can be integrated with various cloud and on-premises storage solutions, offering more flexibility in storage environments.

**5. High Availability**: Google Cloud Storage guarantees high availability and durability of data through replication and redundancy mechanisms built into the service. Rook relies on the underlying storage systems for high availability, which may vary depending on the configuration and setup of these systems.

**6. Data Security**: Google Cloud Storage provides advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access controls, and audit logs to protect data. Rook relies on the security measures of the underlying storage systems, requiring users to ensure proper security configurations and practices.

In Summary, Google Cloud Storage and Rook differ in scalability, cost, managed service options, integration capabilities, high availability mechanisms, and data security measures.

Decisions about Google Cloud Storage and Rook

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

See more
Gabriel Pa

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Storage
Pros of Rook
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
  • 2
    More praticlal and easy
  • 3
    Minio Integration
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Cloud Storage
Cons of Rook
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Ceph is difficult
    • 1
      Slow

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Google Cloud Storage?

    Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

    What is Rook?

    It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Google Cloud Storage?
    What companies use Rook?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Google Cloud Storage?
    What tools integrate with Rook?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage and Rook?
    Google Drive
    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
    Firebase
    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
    Amazon Glacier
    In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.
    Amazon S3
    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    DigitalOcean Spaces
    DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.
    See all alternatives