Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud Storage vs Portworx: What are the differences?
## Key Differences between Google Cloud Storage and Portworx
Google Cloud Storage is a scalable, fully-managed object storage service while Portworx is a container data management platform designed for enterprises.
1. **Deployment**: Google Cloud Storage is deployed on Google's infrastructure and does not require managing any underlying hardware. In contrast, Portworx needs to be deployed within Kubernetes clusters and requires more management and configuration.
2. **Features**: Google Cloud Storage primarily focuses on storing and retrieving data, whereas Portworx offers a wider range of features including data protection, disaster recovery, encryption, and data mobility.
3. **Integration**: Google Cloud Storage integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Dataflow, and ML Engine. On the other hand, Portworx integrates tightly with Kubernetes and provides storage and data management functionalities specifically for containerized applications.
4. **Scalability**: Google Cloud Storage is highly scalable and can handle massive amounts of data storage efficiently. While Portworx also offers scalability, it is more tailored towards scaling data management within Kubernetes environments.
5. **Cost**: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, storage class, and network egress. Portworx, being a software license-based product, has different pricing tiers based on features and support levels.
6. **Use Cases**: Google Cloud Storage is ideal for storing objects, files, backups, and media content in a cloud-native manner, whereas Portworx is better suited for providing persistent storage solutions for stateful applications running in containers, especially in enterprise environments.
In Summary, Google Cloud Storage is a managed object storage service with seamless integration into Google Cloud services, while Portworx is a container data management platform tailored for Kubernetes environments.
We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.
We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.
Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Google Cloud Storage
- Scalable28
- Cheap19
- Reliable14
- Easy9
- Chealp3
- More praticlal and easy1