Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud Run vs Zappa: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Google Cloud Run and Zappa, two popular technologies for deploying serverless applications. Both Google Cloud Run and Zappa offer solutions for running serverless functions, but there are some important distinctions to consider.
Deployment Environment: Google Cloud Run provides a managed runtime environment where developers can deploy containerized applications. It supports any language, framework, or library that can run within a Docker container. On the other hand, Zappa is specifically designed for serverless web applications on AWS Lambda, and it leverages the Python ecosystem for development and deployment.
Platform Compatibility: While Google Cloud Run offers a multi-cloud solution and is compatible with AWS, Azure, and other cloud providers, Zappa is tightly integrated with AWS Lambda and relies heavily on AWS services and infrastructure, limiting its compatibility with other cloud platforms.
Auto Scaling and Scaling Policies: Google Cloud Run automatically handles the scaling of container instances based on incoming request traffic. It offers horizontal scaling by creating more instances to handle increased load. In contrast, Zappa relies on AWS Lambda's built-in auto-scaling capability, which scales based on the number of incoming events and concurrent invocations.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Run pricing is based on the number of requested CPU and memory resources, as well as the duration of each request. This model offers more flexibility in controlling costs, but can require careful optimization for cost-effective usage. Zappa, being tightly integrated with AWS Lambda, follows AWS Lambda's pricing model based on the number of invocations, with additional charges for duration and allocated memory.
Cold Start and Initialization Time: Google Cloud Run faces cold starts when idle containers need to be initialized to handle incoming requests. The initialization time can vary depending on the size and complexity of the container, resulting in potentially longer cold start times. Zappa, on the other hand, benefits from AWS Lambda's automatic container reuse, which reduces cold starts and provides faster response times for subsequent invocations.
Integration with Additional Cloud Services: Google Cloud Run offers seamless integration with other services in the Google Cloud ecosystem, such as Cloud Pub/Sub, Cloud Storage, and Cloud SQL, enabling developers to build more complex applications. While Zappa supports various AWS services, its integration options are more limited compared to the extensive suite of Google Cloud services.
In summary, Google Cloud Run provides a multi-cloud, language-agnostic containerized runtime environment with automatic scaling, while Zappa is a Python-centric framework tightly integrated with AWS Lambda, offering seamless integration with AWS services and reduced cold start times. The choice between Google Cloud Run and Zappa depends on factors such as platform compatibility, deployment requirements, pricing model, and desired integration options.
Run cloud service containers instead of cloud-native services
- Running containers means that your microservices are not "cooked" into a cloud provider's architecture.
- Moving from one cloud to the next means that you simply spin up new instances of your containers in the new cloud using that cloud's container service.
- Start redirecting your traffic to the new resources.
- Turn off the containers in the cloud you migrated from.
Pros of Google Cloud Run
- HTTPS endpoints11
- Fully managed10
- Pay per use10
- Concurrency: multiple requests sent to each container7
- Deploy containers7
- Serverless7
- Custom domains with auto SSL6
- "Invoke IAM permission" to manage authentication4
- Cons0