StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Load Balancer Reverse Proxy
  5. Google Cloud Load Balancing vs Traefik

Google Cloud Load Balancing vs Traefik

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Traefik
Traefik
Stacks965
Followers1.2K
Votes93
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Stacks50
Followers45
Votes0

Google Cloud Load Balancing vs Traefik: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: Google Cloud Load Balancing is designed to handle high traffic loads and scale with demand. It can distribute traffic across multiple regions and auto-scales backend instances based on demand. On the other hand, Traefik is more suitable for smaller deployments and may require additional configuration for high scalability.

  2. Load Balancing Algorithms: Google Cloud Load Balancing supports a variety of load balancing algorithms, including round robin, least connection, and IP hash. It provides flexibility in choosing the most appropriate algorithm for specific requirements. Traefik, on the other hand, primarily uses a round robin algorithm by default and may require additional configuration to use other load balancing algorithms.

  3. Health Checks: Google Cloud Load Balancing has built-in health checking capabilities to ensure that traffic is only sent to healthy backend instances. It can perform periodic health checks and automatically remove unhealthy instances from the load balancing pool. Traefik also supports health checks, but the configuration and customization options may be different.

  4. Proxy Protocol: Google Cloud Load Balancing supports Proxy Protocol, which allows passing client connection information to the backend instances. This can be useful in scenarios where backend applications need to know the original client IP address. Traefik also supports Proxy Protocol, but the configuration may require additional steps.

  5. Service Discovery Integration: Traefik has built-in integrations with popular service discovery platforms like Consul, Etcd, and Kubernetes. It can automatically discover and configure routing rules based on the dynamic changes in the service infrastructure. Google Cloud Load Balancing can integrate with service discovery platforms, but it may require additional configuration and setup.

  6. Pricing: Google Cloud Load Balancing has a pricing structure based on usage, which includes factors like traffic volume and number of forwarding rules. Traefik, being open-source software, does not have any direct pricing but may involve additional costs for infrastructure and maintenance requirements.

In Summary, Google Cloud Load Balancing provides high scalability, flexible load balancing algorithms, built-in health checks, Proxy Protocol support, and integrations with service discovery platforms. Traefik is more suitable for smaller deployments, primarily uses round robin load balancing, has health check support, and can integrate with service discovery platforms but may require more configuration and setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Traefik
Traefik
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

You can scale your applications on Google Compute Engine from zero to full-throttle with it, with no pre-warming needed. You can distribute your load-balanced compute resources in single or multiple regions, close to your users and to meet your high availability requirements.

Continuously updates its configuration (No restarts!); Supports multiple load balancing algorithms; Provides HTTPS to your microservices by leveraging Let's Encrypt (wildcard certificates support); Circuit breakers, retry; High Availability with cluster mode; See the magic through its clean web UI; Websocket, HTTP/2, GRPC ready; Provides metrics; Keeps access logs; Fast; Exposes a Rest API
Autoscaling; No pre-warming needed
Statistics
Stacks
965
Stacks
50
Followers
1.2K
Followers
45
Votes
93
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Kubernetes integration
  • 18
    Watch service discovery updates
  • 14
    Letsencrypt support
  • 13
    Swarm integration
  • 12
    Several backends
Cons
  • 7
    Complicated setup
  • 7
    Not very performant (fast)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Marathon
Marathon
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
gRPC
gRPC
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Consul
Consul
StatsD
StatsD
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform

What are some alternatives to Traefik, Google Cloud Load Balancing?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.

F5 BIG-IP

F5 BIG-IP

It ensures that applications are always secure and perform the way they should. You get built-in security, traffic management, and performance application services, whether your applications live in a private data center or in the cloud.

GLBC

GLBC

It is a GCE L7 load balancer controller that manages external loadbalancers configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana